---
title: "Lefeng Solar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Lefeng Solar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/lefeng-solar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Lefeng Solar vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Lefeng Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Ningbo, Zhejiang Province | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2005 | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity | 2 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [http://www.lefnsolar.com](http://www.lefnsolar.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Ningbo Lefeng New Energy Co., Ltd. is a leading manufacturer in the photovoltaic industry, specializing in the production and sales of PV modules and cells. The company is also involved in the development, construction, and maintenance of photovoltaic power plants. Lefeng is committed to providing high-quality...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Lefeng Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 340 | +340 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 760 W | +760 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 520 W | +520 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Lefeng Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.71% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Lefeng Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Lefeng Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Lefeng Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Lefeng Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Lefeng Solar is a Chinese manufacturer based in Ningbo, established in 2005 as Ningbo Lefeng New Energy Co., Ltd., with a reported annual production capacity of approximately 2 GW. The company produces photovoltaic modules across monocrystalline and polycrystalline technologies, including bifacial and TOPCon variants, and also develops solar power plants. Lefeng does not appear on BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability lists, and its global profile remains limited compared to the major Chinese module suppliers. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, China, is one of the world's largest solar manufacturers, with annual production capacity exceeding 100 GW and cumulative global shipments surpassing 292 GW as of June 2025. Trina has topped BloombergNEF's bankability ranking for the eighth time, achieving a 100% recognition rate from all survey respondents, and has maintained PVEL Top Performer status for eleven consecutive years. By any institutional measure, Trina Solar operates at a fundamentally different scale and credibility tier.

Lefeng Solar's portfolio spans modules from 265 W to 670 W, covering residential rooftop and small commercial use cases, with the company positioning itself as a cost-accessible option for buyers less focused on brand recognition. Independent reviews and installer feedback for Lefeng are scarce in international markets, making field-based performance assessment difficult. Trina Solar's product lineup is more clearly segmented: the Vertex S and Vertex S+ G3 series, built on N-type TOPCon cell technology, targets residential and C&I rooftop markets with efficiencies reaching 23.2%, while the Vertex N series addresses utility-scale ground-mount projects with modules rated up to 760 W and efficiencies of up to 24.5%. Flagship Vertex N products carry 30-year performance warranties.

For most international buyers - whether selecting panels for a home rooftop, a commercial facility, or a mid-scale ground-mount project - Trina Solar is the more defensible choice. Its documented bankability, deep warranty backing, and global service infrastructure reduce long-term risk materially. Lefeng Solar may suit highly price-sensitive procurement where brand recognition is secondary, but the absence of Tier 1 status and limited independent performance data are meaningful considerations that should factor into any purchasing decision.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Lefeng Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/lefeng-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Lefeng Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/lefeng-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Lefeng Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/lefeng-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/lefeng-solar-vs-trina-solar