---
title: "LEDVANCE vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare LEDVANCE vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ledvance-vs-trina-solar"
---

# LEDVANCE vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 124 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. LEDVANCE leans bifacial (62% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | LEDVANCE | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Germany | China |
| Headquarters | Garching bei München | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2016 | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.ledvance.com](https://www.ledvance.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | LEDVANCE | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 124 | 340 | +216 |
| Max Power | 705 W | 760 W | +55 W |
| Avg Power | 518 W | 520 W | +2 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | LEDVANCE | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.40% | 24.80% | +1.40 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.58% | 21.71% | +0.14 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | LEDVANCE | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.313%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.011 |
| Bifacial Share | 77 (62%) | 145 (43%) | +19 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.4 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +0.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | LEDVANCE | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 4 (3.2%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 30 (24.2%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 42 (33.9%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 43 (34.7%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 5 (4.0%) | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | LEDVANCE | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (6.5%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 56 (45.2%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 34 (27.4%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 22 (17.7%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 4 (3.2%) | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (48%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | LEDVANCE | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 60 (48.4%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| TOPCon | 54 (43.5%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| HJT | 10 (8.1%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, LEDVANCE


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/ledvance-m685-705n66ub-sf-f7-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [M705N66UB-SF-F7](https://comparepv.com/panel/ledvance-m705n66ub-sf-f7) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/ledvance-m685-705n66ub-sf-f7-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [M700N66UB-SF-F7](https://comparepv.com/panel/ledvance-m700n66ub-sf-f7) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695](https://comparepv.com/panel/ledvance-m685-705n66ub-sf-f7-695) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [M695N66UB-SF-F7](https://comparepv.com/panel/ledvance-m695n66ub-sf-f7) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-690](https://comparepv.com/panel/ledvance-m685-705n66ub-sf-f7-690) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [M690N66UB-SF-F7](https://comparepv.com/panel/ledvance-m690n66ub-sf-f7) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-685](https://comparepv.com/panel/ledvance-m685-705n66ub-sf-f7-685) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [M685N66UB-SF-F7](https://comparepv.com/panel/ledvance-m685n66ub-sf-f7) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

LEDVANCE is a Germany-headquartered company founded in 2016 as a spin-off from Osram Licht AG, and has been wholly owned by the Chinese lighting group MLS since 2018. Its solar photovoltaic division, branded LEDVANCE Renewables, was launched only in 2024, giving the company a very short track record in module manufacturing. No Tier 1 or BloombergNEF bankability designation has been confirmed for its PV products. Trina Solar, by contrast, is one of the world's largest dedicated solar manufacturers, headquartered in China with over two decades in the industry. It has been repeatedly recognized on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV module list - including both Q1 and Q2 2025 - and achieved a 100% bankability rating from BNEF respondents for the eighth consecutive time in 2025. Trina Solar shipped 65.21 GW of modules in 2023 alone and is scaling module capacity toward 120 GW, placing it in an entirely different league from LEDVANCE in terms of institutional credibility and industrial footprint.

LEDVANCE Renewables markets an integrated package of solar panels (405 W to 660 W, in both monofacial and bifacial variants), inverters, and battery storage systems, positioning the offering as a unified building-energy ecosystem that complements its established lighting business. This bundled approach may appeal to property owners or facility managers seeking a single-vendor relationship, but LEDVANCE does not yet publish independently verified cell-technology specifications or efficiency certifications beyond its own product pages. Trina Solar addresses all major market segments - residential rooftop, commercial and industrial installations, and utility-scale ground-mount projects. Its flagship lines are built on n-type TOPCon cell technology, with a 760 W module confirmed at 24.5% conversion efficiency and a research-grade TOPCon cell certified at 26.58% by Germany's ISFH. The company has held PVEL Top Performer status for eleven consecutive years, and select flagship modules carry 30-year performance warranties.

For most buyers - residential prosumers, C&I project developers, and finance-backed utility-scale portfolios alike - Trina Solar is the clear default recommendation. It offers confirmed bankability, proven large-scale manufacturing, a broad product range anchored in leading TOPCon technology, and the institutional recognition that lenders and EPCs require. LEDVANCE Renewables is worth evaluating only for buyers specifically seeking a tightly integrated solar-plus-lighting-plus-storage package under a single European-branded vendor, and even then its PV credentials remain unverified by independent bodies. The two brands are not interchangeable: Trina Solar is a tier-one solar manufacturer with a long global track record, while LEDVANCE is a lighting company that has only just entered the solar space.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [LEDVANCE vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ledvance-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [LEDVANCE vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ledvance-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [LEDVANCE vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ledvance-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ledvance-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.