---
title: "Leapton vs ZNShine - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Leapton vs ZNShine solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/leapton-vs-znshine"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/leapton/znshine.png"
---

# Leapton vs ZNShine

ZNShine has the broader catalog (212 vs 120 models). Leapton leads on peak efficiency at 23.32%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Leapton | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Japan | China |
| Headquarters | Kobe | Suqian |
| Founded | 2012 | 1988 |
| Employees |  | 1,200 |
| Annual capacity | 3+ GW/year | 10 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | NEEQ: 838463 |
| Website | [http://www.leaptonpv.com/](http://www.leaptonpv.com/) | [http://www.znshinesolar.com](http://www.znshinesolar.com) |

Leapton Energy, headquartered in Japan, is a global leader in the solar PV industry, specializing in Tier-1 solar modules, battery energy storage systems (BESS), and inverters. With over 10 years of experience, Leapton Energy's products are now available in more than 70 countries worldwide.

ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Leapton | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 120 | 212 | +92 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 670 W | +50 W |
| Avg Power | 546 W | 535 W | +11 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Leapton | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.32% | 22.83% | +0.49 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.20% | 21.35% | +0.86 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Leapton | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.306%/°C | -0.329%/°C | +0.023 |
| Bifacial Share | 59 (49%) | 89 (42%) | +7 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | 28.3 yrs | +1.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Leapton skews to higher efficiency: 8% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Leapton | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 5 (4.2%) | 59 (27.8%) |
| 21-22% | 31 (25.8%) | 101 (47.6%) |
| 22-23% | 74 (61.7%) | 47 (22.2%) |
| 23%+ | 10 (8.3%) | 0 |
| \<20% | 0 | 5 (2.4%) |


## Power distribution

Leapton offers more 600W+ panels (32% of lineup)


| Power band | Leapton | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 49 (40.8%) | 64 (30.2%) |
| 500-599W | 33 (27.5%) | 99 (46.7%) |
| 600-699W | 28 (23.3%) | 43 (20.3%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (8.3%) | 0 |
| \<400W | 0 | 6 (2.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (92%)

Dominant cell tech: PERC (63%)


| Technology | Leapton | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 110 (91.7%) | 78 (36.8%) |
| N-type | 10 (8.3%) | 0 |
| PERC | 0 | 134 (63.2%) |


## Top panels, Leapton


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w) | 715 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-715w) | 715 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, ZNShine


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ZXM8-TP132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ZXM8-TP132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [ZXM8-TP132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [ZXM8-TP132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Leapton is a Japanese-founded manufacturer established in Kobe in 2012, with its solar module production concentrated at a factory in Changshu, Jiangsu province, China, operating since 2017. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankable status and reported an annual production capacity of approximately 3 GW as of late 2024. ZNShine, formally ZNSHINE PV-TECH Co., Ltd., traces its origins to 1988 and entered the solar module business in 2006, subsequently building production bases in Changzhou, Suqian, and Yunnan in China. It has maintained BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability continuously since 2015 and has reached a combined manufacturing capacity of 10 GW - roughly three times that of Leapton. By any measure of institutional scale and global manufacturing footprint, ZNShine carries the heavier weight.

Leapton's catalog covers PERC and TOPCon (N-type) modules ranging from around 400 W to over 700 W, with peak efficiency reaching 23.3% in its latest series. The brand has carved out a strong reputation in the residential and small commercial rooftop segment. Notably, its modules earned Top Performer recognition across four reliability test categories in the Kiwa PVEL 2025 PV Module Reliability Scorecard - thermal cycling, mechanical stress sequence, hail stress sequence, and LID+LETID - which is a meaningful independent quality signal. Product and power warranties run to 25 years, extending to 30 years for bifacial and N-type variants. ZNShine competes across a broader spectrum, offering N-type TOPCon bifacial panels in the 600 W class, HJT bifacial modules reaching up to 750 W, and steel-frame N-type products aimed at utility-scale ground-mounted plants. With a presence spanning over 80 countries and a track record as an EPC developer for large power stations, ZNShine is firmly oriented toward commercial and utility buyers.

For a typical international buyer sizing a rooftop or mid-scale C&I project, Leapton's independently verified reliability scores and Japanese quality oversight make it a defensible pick, especially where bankability documentation and warranty depth are scrutinized by lenders. Buyers planning utility-scale procurement or needing a supplier capable of multi-hundred-megawatt volumes will find ZNShine's manufacturing scale and project-development track record more compelling. For projects where both brands meet the technical threshold, the decision will largely come down to price, local distributor availability, and the specific requirements of the financing institution.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Leapton vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/leapton-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-znshine)
- [Leapton vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/leapton-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-znshine)
- [Leapton vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/leapton-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-znshine)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/leapton-vs-znshine

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.