---
title: "Leapton vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Leapton vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/leapton-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Leapton vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 119 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Leapton | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Japan | China |
| Headquarters | Kobe | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2012 | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity | 3+ GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [http://www.leaptonpv.com/](http://www.leaptonpv.com/) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Leapton Energy, headquartered in Japan, is a global leader in the solar PV industry, specializing in Tier-1 solar modules, battery energy storage systems (BESS), and inverters. With over 10 years of experience, Leapton Energy's products are now available in more than 70 countries worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Leapton | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 119 | 340 | +221 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 760 W | +40 W |
| Avg Power | 546 W | 520 W | +26 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Leapton | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.32% | 24.80% | +1.48 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 21.71% | +0.46 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Leapton | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.307%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.005 |
| Bifacial Share | 58 (49%) | 145 (43%) | +6 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Leapton | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 5 (4.2%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 32 (26.9%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 74 (62.2%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 8 (6.7%) | 76 (22.4%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Leapton | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 48 (40.3%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 33 (27.7%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 28 (23.5%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (8.4%) | 44 (12.9%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (88%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Leapton | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 105 (88.2%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| N-type | 14 (11.8%) | 6 (1.8%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |


## Top panels, Leapton


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w) | 715 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-715w) | 715 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Leapton is a solar manufacturer founded in 2012 with its corporate headquarters in Kobe, Japan, while its production facility operates in Changshu, Jiangsu Province, China. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status and, as of late 2024, reported an annual production capacity of approximately 3 GW. Trina Solar, by contrast, was founded in 1997 in Changzhou, China, by Jifan Gao, and has grown into one of the world's four largest solar module suppliers - shipping over 70 GW in 2024 alone and accumulating more than 205 GW of cumulative global deliveries across over 100 countries. Trina holds a long-standing BloombergNEF Tier 1 designation and has been recognised as a PVEL Top Performer for 11 consecutive years. In terms of institutional scale, supply-chain depth, and global reach, Trina Solar commands a substantially stronger footprint.

Leapton's product lineup centres on N-type TOPCon modules covering residential rooftop, commercial and industrial rooftop, and ground-mount applications, with the latest models reaching up to 625 W. Its panels were named top performers in Kiwa PVEL's 2025 PV Module Reliability Scorecard across thermal cycling, mechanical stress sequence, hail stress, and LID/LETID tests - credentials that matter to project developers and lenders evaluating long-term degradation risk. Trina Solar offers a more segmented portfolio: the Vertex S+ series targets residential and commercial rooftops with outputs up to 495 W and efficiencies up to 24.3%, while the Vertex N series, built on i-TOPCon technology, covers utility-scale and large commercial ground-mount projects with modules reaching 760 W at 24.5% efficiency.

For most international buyers - whether procuring at utility scale, building a commercial C&I portfolio, or specifying modules for a residential developer - Trina Solar is the more practical default choice. Its production scale ensures supply security, its long track record simplifies lender due diligence, and its tiered product families align naturally with different project sizes. Leapton is a well-regarded niche Tier 1 brand suited to buyers who want independently verified reliability results and prefer to look beyond the top-five global suppliers. The two brands are not interchangeable in terms of scalability or institutional recognition, though on a module-for-module basis, product quality is broadly comparable.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Leapton vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/leapton-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Leapton vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/leapton-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Leapton vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/leapton-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/leapton-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.