--- title: "Leapton vs Runergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Leapton vs Runergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/leapton-vs-runergy" --- # Leapton vs Runergy Runergy has the broader catalog (124 vs 119 models). Runergy leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. Runergy leans bifacial (77% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Leapton | Runergy | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | Japan | China | | Headquarters | Kobe | Yancheng, Jiangsu Province | | Founded | 2012 | 2013 | | Employees | | 15,000 | | Annual capacity | 3+ GW/year | 23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year | | Tier 1 | yes | yes | | Listed | | | | Website | [http://www.leaptonpv.com/](http://www.leaptonpv.com/) | [http://www.runergy.com](http://www.runergy.com) | Leapton Energy, headquartered in Japan, is a global leader in the solar PV industry, specializing in Tier-1 solar modules, battery energy storage systems (BESS), and inverters. With over 10 years of experience, Leapton Energy's products are now available in more than 70 countries worldwide. Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Leapton | Runergy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 119 | 124 | +5 | | Max Power | 720 W | 740 W | +20 W | | Avg Power | 546 W | 579 W | +33 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Leapton | Runergy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 23.32% | 24.10% | +0.78 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 22.42% | +0.24 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Leapton | Runergy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.307%/°C | -0.298%/°C | +0.008 | | Bifacial Share | 58 (49%) | 95 (77%) | +28 pp | | Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +0.4 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Leapton | Runergy | | --- | --- | --- | | 20-21% | 5 (4.2%) | 9 (7.3%) | | 21-22% | 32 (26.9%) | 26 (21.0%) | | 22-23% | 74 (62.2%) | 48 (38.7%) | | 23%+ | 8 (6.7%) | 41 (33.1%) | ## Power distribution Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup) | Power band | Leapton | Runergy | | --- | --- | --- | | 400-499W | 48 (40.3%) | 36 (29.0%) | | 500-599W | 33 (27.7%) | 28 (22.6%) | | 600-699W | 28 (23.5%) | 35 (28.2%) | | 700W+ | 10 (8.4%) | 25 (20.2%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (88%) Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (60%) | Technology | Leapton | Runergy | | --- | --- | --- | | TOPCon | 105 (88.2%) | 0 | | N-type | 14 (11.8%) | 74 (59.7%) | | PERC | 0 | 32 (25.8%) | | HJT | 0 | 18 (14.5%) | ## Top panels, Leapton | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w) | 715 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-715w) | 715 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Runergy | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [HY-DH132H10-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [HY-DH132H10-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [HY-DH132H10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [HY-DH132N10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [HY-DH132H10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [HY-DH132N10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Other comparisons - [Leapton vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/leapton-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-runergy) - [Leapton vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/leapton-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-runergy) - [Leapton vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/leapton-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-runergy) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/leapton-vs-runergy Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.