---
title: "Leapton vs Phono Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Leapton vs Phono Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/leapton-vs-phono-solar"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/leapton/phono-solar.png"
---

# Leapton vs Phono Solar

Phono Solar has the broader catalog (174 vs 120 models). Phono Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.50%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Leapton | Phono Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Japan | China |
| Headquarters | Kobe | Nanjing |
| Founded | 2012 | 2004 |
| Employees |  | 13000+ |
| Annual capacity | 3+ GW/year | 3-4 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [http://www.leaptonpv.com/](http://www.leaptonpv.com/) | [https://www.phonosolar.com](https://www.phonosolar.com) |

Leapton Energy, headquartered in Japan, is a global leader in the solar PV industry, specializing in Tier-1 solar modules, battery energy storage systems (BESS), and inverters. With over 10 years of experience, Leapton Energy's products are now available in more than 70 countries worldwide.

Phono Solar Technology Co., Ltd. specializes in the research, development, and manufacture of photovoltaic solar panels and is a global provider of solar products and services. The company is affiliated with SUMEC Group, a subsidiary of China National Machinery Industry Corporation (SINOMACH). Phono Solar has been...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Leapton | Phono Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 120 | 174 | +54 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 730 W | +10 W |
| Avg Power | 546 W | 515 W | +31 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Leapton | Phono Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.32% | 23.50% | +0.18 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.20% | 21.77% | +0.43 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Leapton | Phono Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.306%/°C | -0.306%/°C | +0.001 |
| Bifacial Share | 59 (49%) | 74 (43%) | +7 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | 27.1 yrs | +2.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Phono Solar skews to higher efficiency: 11% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Leapton | Phono Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 5 (4.2%) | 37 (21.3%) |
| 21-22% | 31 (25.8%) | 53 (30.5%) |
| 22-23% | 74 (61.7%) | 62 (35.6%) |
| 23%+ | 10 (8.3%) | 19 (10.9%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 3 (1.7%) |


## Power distribution

Leapton offers more 600W+ panels (32% of lineup)


| Power band | Leapton | Phono Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 49 (40.8%) | 78 (44.8%) |
| 500-599W | 33 (27.5%) | 51 (29.3%) |
| 600-699W | 28 (23.3%) | 23 (13.2%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (8.3%) | 12 (6.9%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 10 (5.7%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (92%)

Dominant cell tech: PERC (37%)


| Technology | Leapton | Phono Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 110 (91.7%) | 53 (30.5%) |
| N-type | 10 (8.3%) | 50 (28.7%) |
| PERC | 0 | 65 (37.4%) |
| HJT | 0 | 5 (2.9%) |
| Back Contact | 0 | 1 (0.6%) |


## Top panels, Leapton


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w) | 715 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-715w) | 715 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Phono Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps730m13gfh-22-wshw) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [NS-730MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps725m13gfh-22-wshw) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps720m13gfh-22-wshw) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NS-720MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-720mh-132) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps715m13gfh-22-wshw) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wnh) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wshw) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NS-710MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-710mh-132) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [PS705M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps705m13gfh-22-wnh) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Leapton is a manufacturer with Japanese origins, founded in Kobe in 2012, with module production carried out at a factory in Changshu, Jiangsu, China, established in 2017. The company reports an annual production capacity of approximately 3 GW and holds Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 status. It was also named a top performer across four test categories in the 2024 Kiwa PVEL PV Module Reliability Scorecard, covering thermal cycling, mechanical stress sequence, hail resistance, and LID+LETID testing. Phono Solar was founded in 2004 and is headquartered in Nanjing, China, operating under SUMEC Group - a subsidiary of the state-owned China National Machinery Industry Corporation (SINOMACH). Phono Solar has maintained BNEF Tier 1 status continuously since 2014, reports annual production capacity in the range of 3 to 4 GW, and has shipped over 20 GW of modules cumulatively worldwide. Its longer Tier 1 track record and state-enterprise affiliation give it the stronger institutional footprint of the two brands.

Leapton's lineup is built primarily around N-type TOPCon cells, with average module efficiency reported at around 22.2% and top models reaching 23.3%. The brand covers residential rooftop installations, small-to-mid commercial systems, and utility-scale projects, and is typically priced 20 to 30 percent below comparable modules from the largest Chinese manufacturers - making it a compelling budget Tier 1 option where cost optimisation and bankability both matter. Phono Solar markets its N-type TOPCon products under the Draco series, spanning from around 320 W up to at least 590 W, with efficiency in the 590 W class reaching approximately 22.8%. The portfolio addresses residential, C&I, and utility-scale segments, and the parent group's track record in project development strengthens its credibility with institutional and independent power producer buyers.

For most international buyers, the two brands are broadly interchangeable as solid mid-tier Tier 1 choices. Phono Solar is the more natural fit when institutional credentials, a decade-plus of continuous BNEF recognition, and higher-wattage utility-scale sourcing are priorities. Leapton suits buyers where price is the primary lever alongside bankability, and its strong PVEL test results confirm that the cost advantage does not come at the expense of long-term reliability. Local distributor availability and after-sales service coverage will often be the practical tiebreaker.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Leapton vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/leapton-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Phono Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-phono-solar)
- [Leapton vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/leapton-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Phono Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-phono-solar)
- [Leapton vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/leapton-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Phono Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-phono-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/leapton-vs-phono-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.