---
title: "Kyocera vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Kyocera vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/kyocera-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Kyocera vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 8 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Kyocera | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Japan | China |
| Headquarters | Kyoto | Changzhou |
| Founded | 1959 | 1997 |
| Employees | 77,136 |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed | TYO: 6971 |  |
| Website | [https://global.kyocera.com](https://global.kyocera.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Kyocera Corporation is a Japanese multinational electronics and ceramics manufacturer. Founded in 1959, the company produces a diverse range of products, including industrial ceramics, solar power generating systems, telecommunications equipment, and office document imaging equipment. Kyocera is committed to...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Kyocera | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 8 | 340 | +332 |
| Max Power | 410 W | 760 W | +350 W |
| Avg Power | 302 W | 520 W | +218 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Kyocera | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 21.00% | 24.80% | +3.80 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 18.21% | 21.71% | +3.50 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Kyocera | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.460%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.158 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +3.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Kyocera | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 5 (62.5%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 1 (12.5%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 2 (25.0%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Kyocera | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 6 (75.0%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 2 (25.0%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Kyocera | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 8 (100.0%) | 11 (3.2%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Kyocera


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [KT410W-108HL4](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt410w-108hl4) | 410 | 21.0 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [KT410W-108HL4B](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt410w-108hl4b) | 410 | 21.0 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [KK280P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk280p-3cd3cg) | 280 | 17.0 | - | Polycrystalline |
| 4 | [KK275P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk275p-3cd3cg) | 275 | 16.7 | - | Polycrystalline |
| 5 | [KU270-6MCA](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-ku270-6mca) | 270 | 16.4 | -0.460 | Polycrystalline |
| 6 | [KU270-6MPA](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-ku270-6mpa) | 270 | 16.4 | -0.460 | Polycrystalline |
| 7 | [KK270P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk270p-3cd3cg) | 270 | 16.4 | - | Polycrystalline |
| 8 | [KT230W-60HL4B](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt230w-60hl4b) | 230 | 20.8 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Kyocera is a Japanese electronics conglomerate founded in 1959 as Kyoto Ceramic Company, with solar research dating back to 1975 and commercial polycrystalline silicon production beginning in 1982. Headquartered in Kyoto, the company launched Japan's first residential solar power system in 1993 and built a strong domestic track record over the following decades. However, after closing its North American operations in 2016, Kyocera significantly scaled back its global solar footprint and today operates primarily within Japan and select Asian markets. Trina Solar, marketed as Trinasolar, is a Chinese photovoltaics company founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, China, and has grown into one of the world's largest module manufacturers, targeting annual module production capacity of approximately 120 GW by the end of 2024. Trina Solar has earned BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status consistently over many years, topping BNEF's bankability survey for the eighth time in 2025 with a 100% recognition rate from all survey respondents. On institutional footprint, Trina Solar is the considerably stronger player, with a wider global distribution network and deep lender recognition across major financing markets.

Kyocera's current product lineup centers on the Japanese residential rooftop segment. Its newer monocrystalline modules achieve efficiencies above 22%, and as recently as March 2025 the company released 410W modules engineered specifically for regions with heavy snow loads - a niche well suited to its home market but of limited relevance to most international buyers. International availability remains narrow. Trina Solar, by contrast, addresses a broad range of applications through its Vertex product family, spanning residential, commercial-and-industrial (C&I), and large-scale utility ground-mount projects. The Vertex S+ and related series use N-type TOPCon cell technology, delivering efficiencies of up to approximately 22.5%. Flagship models carry a 30-year performance warranty, and the company has achieved an AA rating for supply chain traceability from TUV Rheinland, covering the entire chain from polysilicon to finished module.

For most international buyers - whether procuring modules for utility-scale development, C&I rooftop systems, or residential installations outside Japan - Trina Solar is the more practical default. Its broad product portfolio, confirmed Tier 1 bankability, competitive pricing, and strong installer ecosystem make it a capable choice across virtually all project types. Kyocera is a credible and historically reputable option for buyers operating in Japan or valuing a decades-long residential track record, but its limited international reach and narrower technology offering make it a niche selection in the context of today's global solar market.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Kyocera vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/kyocera-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Kyocera vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/kyocera-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Kyocera vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/kyocera-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/kyocera-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.