--- title: "Kyocera vs ARTsolar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Kyocera vs ARTsolar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/kyocera-vs-artsolar" --- # Kyocera vs ARTsolar Kyocera has the broader catalog (8 vs 0 models). ## The two companies | Attribute | Kyocera | ARTsolar | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | Japan | South Africa | | Headquarters | Kyoto | Durban | | Founded | 1959 | 2010 | | Employees | 77,136 | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | | no | | Listed | TYO: 6971 | | | Website | [https://global.kyocera.com](https://global.kyocera.com) | [https://www.artsolar.co.za](https://www.artsolar.co.za) | Kyocera Corporation is a Japanese multinational electronics and ceramics manufacturer. Founded in 1959, the company produces a diverse range of products, including industrial ceramics, solar power generating systems, telecommunications equipment, and office document imaging equipment. Kyocera is committed to... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Kyocera | ARTsolar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 8 | 0 | +8 | | Max Power | 410 W | 0 W | +410 W | | Avg Power | 302 W | 0 W | +302 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Kyocera | ARTsolar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 21.00% | - | | | Avg Efficiency | 18.21% | - | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Kyocera | ARTsolar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.460%/°C | - | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | | | Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | - | | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | Kyocera | ARTsolar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 5 (62.5%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 1 (12.5%) | 0 | | 21-22% | 2 (25.0%) | 0 | ## Power distribution | Power band | Kyocera | ARTsolar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 6 (75.0%) | 0 | | 400-499W | 2 (25.0%) | 0 | ## Cell technology | Technology | Kyocera | ARTsolar | | --- | --- | --- | | Unknown | 8 (100.0%) | 0 | ## Top panels, Kyocera | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [KT410W-108HL4](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt410w-108hl4) | 410 | 21.0 | - | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [KT410W-108HL4B](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt410w-108hl4b) | 410 | 21.0 | - | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [KK280P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk280p-3cd3cg) | 280 | 17.0 | - | Polycrystalline | | 4 | [KK275P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk275p-3cd3cg) | 275 | 16.7 | - | Polycrystalline | | 5 | [KU270-6MCA](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-ku270-6mca) | 270 | 16.4 | -0.460 | Polycrystalline | | 6 | [KU270-6MPA](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-ku270-6mpa) | 270 | 16.4 | -0.460 | Polycrystalline | | 7 | [KK270P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk270p-3cd3cg) | 270 | 16.4 | - | Polycrystalline | | 8 | [KT230W-60HL4B](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt230w-60hl4b) | 230 | 20.8 | - | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Kyocera is a Japanese manufacturer headquartered in Kyoto, founded in 1959 as Kyoto Ceramic Co. The company entered solar R&D in 1975 and began mass-producing polycrystalline silicon cells in 1982, making it one of the earliest commercial solar pioneers globally. However, Kyocera exited North and South American solar markets in 2016 and has since operated with a significantly reduced international footprint, focusing primarily on domestic Japanese and select Asian markets. No current BloombergNEF Tier 1 listing for Kyocera could be confirmed through available sources. ARTsolar, by contrast, is a 100% South African-owned company founded in 2010 in Durban by Eshu Seevnarayan, Patrick Goss, and Nhlanhla Zondo. It is widely described as South Africa's only locally-owned PV manufacturer and has an annual assembly capacity of approximately 340 MW following a recent facility upgrade. On institutional footprint at the global level, Kyocera's longer history and brand recognition give it the edge, though its active commercial presence has shrunk considerably. Kyocera built its reputation on durable, polycrystalline silicon modules targeted at residential rooftops and small commercial installations. In markets where panels are still available, they are legacy products rather than a current competitive lineup, and the cell technology of any newly produced Kyocera modules for export has not been independently confirmed in recent reviews. ARTsolar's current product focus has shifted toward utility-scale ground-mount applications, particularly large IPP projects in South Africa's Northern Cape. The company announced a partnership with JA Solar in 2025 to locally produce the DeepBlue 4.0 Pro series, which are large-format n-type modules - a meaningful technology step up from older PERC-based offerings, though the modules are manufactured under JA Solar's design rather than ARTsolar's own cell development. For a buyer in South Africa seeking panels with local-content compliance for procurement programs such as REIPPPP, ARTsolar is the more relevant choice, and its 30-year linear power output guarantee and n-type technology partnership are genuine selling points. For buyers outside Africa, Kyocera's limited availability and dated lineup make it a poor default option, and most independent reviewers suggest looking to currently active global manufacturers instead. The two brands are not meaningfully interchangeable - they serve distinct geographies and institutional contexts. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/are-kyocera-solar-panels-any-good \| Are Kyocera Solar Panels Any Good? - SolarReviews \| review \- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/best-companies/kyocera-solar-panels \| Kyocera Solar Panels 2026 Review - EcoWatch \| review \- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/06/17/ja-solar-artsolar-agree-to-expand-pv-module-manufacturing-in-south-africa/ \| JA Solar and ARTsolar agree to expand PV module manufacturing in South Africa \| article \- https://www.pv-tech.org/industry-updates/ja-solar-deepblue-4-0-pro-modules-now-locally-produced-in-south-africa/ \| JA Solar DeepBlue 4.0 Pro modules now locally produced in South Africa \| article \- https://www.engineeringnews.co.za/article/artsolar-and-ja-solar-driving-south-africas-renewable-energy-revolution-2025-06-12 \| ARTsolar and JA Solar - driving South Africa's renewable energy revolution \| article Sources: \- \[Are Kyocera Solar Panels Any Good? - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/are-kyocera-solar-panels-any-good) \- \[Kyocera Solar Panels 2026 Review - EcoWatch\](https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/best-companies/kyocera-solar-panels) \- \[JA Solar and ARTsolar agree to expand PV module manufacturing in South Africa - pv magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/06/17/ja-solar-artsolar-agree-to-expand-pv-module-manufacturing-in-south-africa/) \- \[JA Solar DeepBlue 4.0 Pro modules now locally produced in South Africa - PV Tech\](https://www.pv-tech.org/industry-updates/ja-solar-deepblue-4-0-pro-modules-now-locally-produced-in-south-africa/) \- \[ARTsolar and JA Solar: Driving South Africa's renewable energy revolution - Engineering News\](https://www.engineeringnews.co.za/article/artsolar-and-ja-solar-driving-south-africas-renewable-energy-revolution-2025-06-12) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Kyocera vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/kyocera-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-artsolar) - [Kyocera vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/kyocera-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar) - [Kyocera vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/kyocera-vs-akcome) - [ASM vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-artsolar) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/kyocera-vs-artsolar Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.