---
title: "Kyocera vs AE Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Kyocera vs AE Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/kyocera-vs-ae-solar"
---

# Kyocera vs AE Solar

AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 8 models). AE Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.43%. AE Solar leans bifacial (63% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Kyocera | AE Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Japan | Germany |
| Headquarters | Kyoto | Gersthofen |
| Founded | 1959 | 2003 |
| Employees | 77,136 | 501-1000 |
| Annual capacity |  | 2+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed | TYO: 6971 |  |
| Website | [https://global.kyocera.com](https://global.kyocera.com) | [https://ae-solar.com](https://ae-solar.com) |

Kyocera Corporation is a Japanese multinational electronics and ceramics manufacturer. Founded in 1959, the company produces a diverse range of products, including industrial ceramics, solar power generating systems, telecommunications equipment, and office document imaging equipment. Kyocera is committed to...

AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Kyocera | AE Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 8 | 646 | +638 |
| Max Power | 410 W | 730 W | +320 W |
| Avg Power | 302 W | 489 W | +187 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Kyocera | AE Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 21.00% | 24.43% | +3.43 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 18.21% | 21.11% | +2.90 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Kyocera | AE Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.460%/°C | -0.312%/°C | +0.148 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 405 (63%) | +63 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 29.7 yrs | +4.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AE Solar skews to higher efficiency: 9% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Kyocera | AE Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 5 (62.5%) | 74 (11.5%) |
| 20-21% | 1 (12.5%) | 171 (26.5%) |
| 21-22% | 2 (25.0%) | 142 (22.0%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 199 (30.8%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 60 (9.3%) |


## Power distribution

AE Solar offers more 600W+ panels (13% of lineup)


| Power band | Kyocera | AE Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 6 (75.0%) | 78 (12.1%) |
| 400-499W | 2 (25.0%) | 329 (50.9%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 154 (23.8%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 55 (8.5%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 30 (4.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (54%)


| Technology | Kyocera | AE Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 8 (100.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 349 (54.0%) |
| PERC | 0 | 245 (37.9%) |
| Back Contact | 0 | 21 (3.3%) |
| N-type | 0 | 17 (2.6%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 9 (1.4%) |
| HJT | 0 | 5 (0.8%) |


## Top panels, Kyocera


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [KT410W-108HL4](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt410w-108hl4) | 410 | 21.0 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [KT410W-108HL4B](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt410w-108hl4b) | 410 | 21.0 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [KK280P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk280p-3cd3cg) | 280 | 17.0 | - | Polycrystalline |
| 4 | [KK275P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk275p-3cd3cg) | 275 | 16.7 | - | Polycrystalline |
| 5 | [KU270-6MCA](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-ku270-6mca) | 270 | 16.4 | -0.460 | Polycrystalline |
| 6 | [KU270-6MPA](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-ku270-6mpa) | 270 | 16.4 | -0.460 | Polycrystalline |
| 7 | [KK270P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk270p-3cd3cg) | 270 | 16.4 | - | Polycrystalline |
| 8 | [KT230W-60HL4B](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt230w-60hl4b) | 230 | 20.8 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AE Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AE CME-132-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720-1) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CME-132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CME-132BDS-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AE Solar is a photovoltaic manufacturer founded in 2003 by Alexander Maier in Königsbrunn, Germany, and operating today as AE Alternative Energy GmbH, headquartered in Gersthofen, Bavaria. The company runs manufacturing facilities in China, Georgia, and Turkey, with a combined annual production capacity of approximately 2.5 GW. In 2024, BloombergNEF ranked AE Solar 18th among 67 evaluated manufacturers in its global PV module bankability report, identifying it as the sole European Tier 1 manufacturer with high bankability - a status it has maintained for at least 13 consecutive quarters. Kyocera Corporation is a Japanese industrial conglomerate founded in 1959 in Kyoto as a ceramics producer; the company began solar cell research in 1975 and launched mass production of polycrystalline silicon modules in 1982, making it one of the earliest pioneers in the PV industry. Despite that heritage, Kyocera exited the North American solar market in 2016, and its European Solar Technical Service Center is set to close permanently on March 31, 2026, with module replacement sales and technical support already discontinued across Europe. In terms of active institutional footprint, AE Solar holds a substantially stronger position today.

AE Solar's product portfolio targets residential rooftop installations and commercial C&I projects, with its Aurora series (P-type PERC) and Meteor series (N-type TOPCon) covering the main efficiency tiers. The Meteor series achieves module efficiency of up to 22.57% and a temperature coefficient of -0.29 percent per degree Celsius. The brand earned the Kiwa PVEL Top Performer Award in 2025 and a five-star rating in PV Magazine's module test. Kyocera, where it still appears in international distribution channels, is effectively legacy stock - active production and sales of its newer, high-efficiency modules continue only in Japan and select Asian markets, with no active supply pipeline to Europe or North America.

For international buyers - whether in Europe, Australia, or other markets - AE Solar is the clear active choice between these two brands. It offers current-generation TOPCon technology, confirmed bankability for project financing, and functioning aftersales support. Kyocera should not be specified for new installations in markets outside Japan, given the company's ongoing withdrawal from Western solar markets and the resulting uncertainty around long-term warranty support and module replacement availability.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Kyocera vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/kyocera-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AEET vs AE Solar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-ae-solar)
- [Kyocera vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/kyocera-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs AE Solar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-ae-solar)
- [Kyocera vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/kyocera-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AE Solar](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-ae-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/kyocera-vs-ae-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.