--- title: "Kyocera vs A.B. Energy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Kyocera vs A.B. Energy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/kyocera-vs-a-b-energy" --- # Kyocera vs A.B. Energy Kyocera has the broader catalog (8 vs 0 models). ## The two companies | Attribute | Kyocera | A.B. Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | Japan | Germany | | Headquarters | Kyoto | Wiesbaden | | Founded | 1959 | 1996 | | Employees | 77,136 | 1,400 | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | | | | Listed | TYO: 6971 | Xetra, Frankfurt Stock Exchange: AB9 | | Website | [https://global.kyocera.com](https://global.kyocera.com) | [https://abo-energy.com](https://abo-energy.com) | Kyocera Corporation is a Japanese multinational electronics and ceramics manufacturer. Founded in 1959, the company produces a diverse range of products, including industrial ceramics, solar power generating systems, telecommunications equipment, and office document imaging equipment. Kyocera is committed to... ABO Energy is a renewable energy company that develops and constructs renewable energy projects, focusing on wind, solar, and storage facilities. They offer turnkey solutions and have connected several gigawatts of nominal output to the grid. The company is active internationally and is committed to driving the energy... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Kyocera | A.B. Energy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 8 | 0 | +8 | | Max Power | 410 W | 0 W | +410 W | | Avg Power | 302 W | 0 W | +302 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Kyocera | A.B. Energy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 21.00% | - | | | Avg Efficiency | 18.21% | - | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Kyocera | A.B. Energy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.460%/°C | - | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | | | Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | - | | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | Kyocera | A.B. Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 5 (62.5%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 1 (12.5%) | 0 | | 21-22% | 2 (25.0%) | 0 | ## Power distribution | Power band | Kyocera | A.B. Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 6 (75.0%) | 0 | | 400-499W | 2 (25.0%) | 0 | ## Cell technology | Technology | Kyocera | A.B. Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | Unknown | 8 (100.0%) | 0 | ## Top panels, Kyocera | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [KT410W-108HL4](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt410w-108hl4) | 410 | 21.0 | - | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [KT410W-108HL4B](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt410w-108hl4b) | 410 | 21.0 | - | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [KK280P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk280p-3cd3cg) | 280 | 17.0 | - | Polycrystalline | | 4 | [KK275P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk275p-3cd3cg) | 275 | 16.7 | - | Polycrystalline | | 5 | [KU270-6MCA](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-ku270-6mca) | 270 | 16.4 | -0.460 | Polycrystalline | | 6 | [KU270-6MPA](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-ku270-6mpa) | 270 | 16.4 | -0.460 | Polycrystalline | | 7 | [KK270P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk270p-3cd3cg) | 270 | 16.4 | - | Polycrystalline | | 8 | [KT230W-60HL4B](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt230w-60hl4b) | 230 | 20.8 | - | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Kyocera is a Japanese conglomerate headquartered in Kyoto, founded in 1959 and one of the longest-standing names in photovoltaics, having launched solar R&D in 1975 and begun mass production of polycrystalline silicon cells in 1982. At its peak, Kyocera was among the world's largest solar module producers, but the company has since dramatically scaled back, ceasing North American operations in 2016 and consolidating manufacturing to a single facility in Japan focused primarily on the domestic residential market. Kyocera does not appear on current BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists for bankable module suppliers, reflecting its reduced global commercial footprint. A.B. Energy srls, by contrast, is a small Italian distributor - not a manufacturer - founded on decades of experience in electric and electronic equipment, with a stated mission to facilitate Italy's energy transition by reselling panels and inverters from established brands including JA Solar, Trina Solar, LONGi, and REC. In terms of institutional depth, Kyocera carries considerably more heritage, though neither entity currently commands a meaningful global production profile. Kyocera's remaining product line targets the Japanese residential rooftop segment, with newer monocrystalline modules reportedly achieving efficiencies above 22%, though the range available outside Japan is extremely limited. A.B. Energy does not manufacture panels at all; it acts as a regional reseller of products from Tier 1 producers, which means panels purchased through A.B. Energy carry the original manufacturer's technology, warranty, and certifications rather than any A.B. Energy proprietary specification. For most buyers in 2025, neither brand represents a straightforward first choice for new installations. Kyocera modules are difficult to source outside Japan and lag behind leading manufacturers in availability and after-sales infrastructure. A.B. Energy is better understood as a local Italian channel partner than a brand to evaluate on its own merits - the relevant product comparison is with whichever manufacturers it currently distributes. Buyers seeking a globally bankable panel should evaluate the underlying module brands directly. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/kyocera-solar \| Kyocera Solar - manufacturer profile and consumer ratings \| review \- https://news.energysage.com/kyocera-solar-panels-complete-review/ \| Kyocera Solar Panels - Complete Review - EnergySage \| review \- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/best-companies/kyocera-solar-panels \| Kyocera Solar Panels 2026 Review - EcoWatch \| review \- https://www.enfsolar.com/a-b-energy \| A.B. Energy srls - company profile and distributed brands - ENF Solar \| article Sources: \- \[Kyocera Solar - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/kyocera-solar) \- \[Kyocera Solar Panels Complete Review - EnergySage\](https://news.energysage.com/kyocera-solar-panels-complete-review/) \- \[Kyocera Solar Panels 2026 Review - EcoWatch\](https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/best-companies/kyocera-solar-panels) \- \[A.B. Energy srls - ENF Solar Directory\](https://www.enfsolar.com/a-b-energy) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Kyocera vs AE Solar](https://comparepv.com/kyocera-vs-ae-solar) - [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy) - [Kyocera vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/kyocera-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy) - [Kyocera vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/kyocera-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-a-b-energy) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/kyocera-vs-a-b-energy Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.