---
title: "Kensol vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Kensol vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/kensol-vs-q-cells"
---

# Kensol vs Q-Cells

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 21 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Kensol leans bifacial (81% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Kensol | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Poland | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Gliwice | Seoul |
| Founded | 2014 | 1999 |
| Employees | null | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity | null GW/year | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website | [https://kensol.pl](https://kensol.pl) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

Kensol is a Polish company founded in 2014 that focuses on providing innovative, ecological, and economical solutions for the renewable energy sector. They design equipment tailored to the needs of the Polish market, specializing in photovoltaic (PV) and heating (HVAC) systems. Kensol offers modern and integrated...

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Kensol | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 21 | 89 | +68 |
| Max Power | 460 W | 675 W | +215 W |
| Avg Power | 437 W | 468 W | +31 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Kensol | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.00% | 23.20% | +0.20 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.04% | 21.21% | +0.83 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Kensol | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.296%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.028 |
| Bifacial Share | 17 (81%) | 35 (39%) | +42 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.0 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +2.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Kensol skews to higher efficiency: 10% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Kensol | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 2 (9.5%) | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 6 (28.6%) | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 11 (52.4%) | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 2 (9.5%) | 2 (2.2%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 7 (7.9%) |


## Power distribution

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)


| Power band | Kensol | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 1 (4.8%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| 400-499W | 20 (95.2%) | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 17 (19.1%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (29%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Kensol | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 8 (38.1%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| N-type | 6 (28.6%) | 23 (25.8%) |
| TOPCon | 5 (23.8%) | 8 (9.0%) |
| PERC | 2 (9.5%) | 38 (42.7%) |


## Top panels, Kensol


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [MNHTR2-BI-460](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-460) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [MNHTR2-BI 460](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-460-1) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [MNHTR2-BI-455](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-455) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [MNHTR2-BI 455](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-455-1) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [MNHTR2-BI-450](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-450) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [KS450MNHTR3-BI](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-ks450mnhtr3-bi) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [MNHTR2-BI 450](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-450-1) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [MNHTR2-BI-445](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-445) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [KS445MNHTR3-BI](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-ks445mnhtr3-bi) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [MNHTR2-BI 445](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-445-1) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Kensol is a small regional solar panel manufacturer based in Gliwice, Poland, operating as Kensol Sp. z o.o. The company targets the European market, primarily Central and Eastern Europe, and does not appear on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 module manufacturer list. No significant annual production capacity figures are publicly documented, which is consistent with its positioning as a niche, domestically focused supplier rather than a global volume player. Q-Cells, by contrast, traces its roots to Thalheim, Germany, where it was founded in 1999 as Q CELLS AG before being acquired by South Korean conglomerate Hanwha Group. Now branded Hanwha Qcells, it holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status, was named an S&P Global 2025 Tier 1 Cleantech company, and operates module production capacity exceeding 11 GW globally - including a 3.3 GW facility in Cartersville, Georgia. Q-Cells carries the substantially stronger institutional footprint of the two.

On the product side, Kensol's documented range centers on monocrystalline PERC panels in the roughly 395-475 W power class, aimed at residential and light commercial rooftops in Europe. Some N-type and bifacial variants are listed in industry directories, though independent performance testing data is scarce. Q-Cells fields two well-documented product families: the Q.PEAK DUO series, a PERC-based line that covers residential through utility-scale applications, and the newer Q.TRON series, which employs proprietary TOPCon N-type technology and achieves efficiencies up to around 22.5%, with a rated annual degradation of approximately 0.33% for those models. Q-Cells panels are widely stocked by North American and European distributors, carry 25-year product and performance warranties, and have ranked third in SolarReviews' 2025 buyer rankings.

For the typical buyer in 2025 - whether a European homeowner or a North American commercial developer - Q-Cells is the clear default choice. Its bankable Tier 1 status, deep installer network, documented warranty service performance, and proven TOPCon product line offer a level of assurance and supply-chain resilience that Kensol, as a smaller regional brand, cannot currently match. Kensol may be a reasonable consideration for Polish buyers seeking locally sourced panels, but outside that context the two brands are not interchangeable.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert Review of Qcells Solar Panels for 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://solartechonline.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-review-2025/ \| Hanwha Q CELLS Solar Panels Review 2025 - SolarTechOnline \| review

\- https://www.hanwha.com/newsroom/news/press-releases/hanwha-qcells-named-an-s-p-global-2025-tier-1-cleantech-company.do \| Hanwha Qcells named 2025 S&P Global Tier 1 Cleantech company \| article

\- https://www.hanwha.com/newsroom/news/press-releases/hanwha-qcells-new-cartersville-factory-set-for-33-gw-of-solar-module-production-per-year.do \| Hanwha Qcells Cartersville factory - 3.3 GW annual module production \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/kensol \| Kensol Sp. z o.o. - Solar Panels - Poland - ENF Solar Directory \| article

Sources:

\- \[Expert Review Of Qcells Solar Panels For 2025\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review)

\- \[Hanwha Q CELLS Solar Panels Review 2025\](https://solartechonline.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-review-2025/)

\- \[Hanwha Qcells named 2025 S&P Global Tier 1 Cleantech company\](https://www.hanwha.com/newsroom/news/press-releases/hanwha-qcells-named-an-s-p-global-2025-tier-1-cleantech-company.do)

\- \[Hanwha Qcells Cartersville 3.3 GW factory announcement\](https://www.hanwha.com/newsroom/news/press-releases/hanwha-qcells-new-cartersville-factory-set-for-33-gw-of-solar-module-production-per-year.do)

\- \[Kensol Sp. z o.o. - ENF Solar Directory\](https://www.enfsolar.com/kensol)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Kensol vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/kensol-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [Kensol vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/kensol-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [Kensol vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/kensol-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/kensol-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.