--- title: "Kensol vs AEET - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Kensol vs AEET solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/kensol-vs-aeet" --- # Kensol vs AEET Kensol has the broader catalog (21 vs 5 models). Kensol leads on peak efficiency at 23.00%. Kensol leans bifacial (81% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Kensol | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | Poland | | | Headquarters | Gliwice | | | Founded | 2014 | | | Employees | null | | | Annual capacity | null GW/year | | | Tier 1 | | no | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://kensol.pl](https://kensol.pl) | | Kensol is a Polish company founded in 2014 that focuses on providing innovative, ecological, and economical solutions for the renewable energy sector. They design equipment tailored to the needs of the Polish market, specializing in photovoltaic (PV) and heating (HVAC) systems. Kensol offers modern and integrated... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Kensol | AEET | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 21 | 5 | +16 | | Max Power | 460 W | 200 W | +260 W | | Avg Power | 437 W | 190 W | +247 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Kensol | AEET | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 23.00% | 15.70% | +7.30 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 22.04% | 14.90% | +7.14 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Kensol | AEET | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.296%/°C | - | | | Bifacial Share | 17 (81%) | 0 (0%) | +81 pp | | Avg Warranty | 29.0 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +4.0 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Kensol skews to higher efficiency: 10% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Kensol | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | 20-21% | 2 (9.5%) | 0 | | 21-22% | 6 (28.6%) | 0 | | 22-23% | 11 (52.4%) | 0 | | 23%+ | 2 (9.5%) | 0 | | \<20% | 0 | 5 (100.0%) | ## Power distribution | Power band | Kensol | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 1 (4.8%) | 5 (100.0%) | | 400-499W | 20 (95.2%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (29%) Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%) | Technology | Kensol | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | Unknown | 8 (38.1%) | 0 | | N-type | 6 (28.6%) | 0 | | TOPCon | 5 (23.8%) | 0 | | PERC | 2 (9.5%) | 5 (100.0%) | ## Top panels, Kensol | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [MNHTR2-BI-460](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-460) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [MNHTR2-BI 460](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-460-1) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [MNHTR2-BI-455](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-455) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [MNHTR2-BI 455](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-455-1) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [MNHTR2-BI-450](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-450) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [KS450MNHTR3-BI](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-ks450mnhtr3-bi) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [MNHTR2-BI 450](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-450-1) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [MNHTR2-BI-445](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-445) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [KS445MNHTR3-BI](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-ks445mnhtr3-bi) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [MNHTR2-BI 445](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-445-1) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, AEET | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline | ## Summary AEET Energy Group GmbH is a Germany-based photovoltaic wholesale partner headquartered in Bad Gandersheim; it functions primarily as a reseller and system integrator rather than a vertically integrated manufacturer, with no publicly confirmed production capacity in GW or founding year on record. Kensol, by contrast, is a Polish solar panel manufacturer founded in 2014 and headquartered in Gliwice, Poland, with an active product line targeting European residential and commercial markets. Neither company appears on Bloomberg NEF's Tier 1 bankable list as of 2025, which places both outside the financing tier required for most large utility-scale projects and limits their practical market to self-funded or lender-flexible installations. On institutional footprint, Kensol has the edge by virtue of a more transparent corporate identity and a significantly larger cataloged product portfolio. The technology gap between the two lineups is substantial. AEET's five-panel catalog averages 190 Wp and 14.9% efficiency, with a peak of 200 Wp at 15.7% - figures consistent with older standard monocrystalline or polycrystalline modules rather than current mainstream products. None of its panels are bifacial, and cell technology is unspecified, limiting transparency for technical buyers. Kensol's 21-panel range averages 437 Wp and 22.0% efficiency, climbing to 460 Wp and 23.0% at the top end, with approximately 81% of models available in bifacial configuration. Its average temperature coefficient of -0.30%/°C is competitive for modern monocrystalline PERC-class products, and an average warranty of roughly 29 years outpaces AEET's 25-year term. AEET's lower-power modules suit buyers repowering older installations with existing racking constraints; Kensol fits modern residential rooftops and mid-scale commercial projects where roof area is limited and per-panel output is a priority. For a new installation in 2025, Kensol is the stronger default across virtually every technical metric - higher wattage, higher efficiency, bifacial versatility, and a longer average warranty. The key shared limitation is the absence of Tier 1 status: neither brand qualifies for project finance structures that require bankable modules, so buyers in that segment will need to look beyond both. Within their natural self-funded market, Kensol's portfolio is clearly the more current and capable offering. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH company profile - ENF Solar directory \| review \- https://www.enfsolar.com/kensol \| Kensol Sp. z o.o. company profile - ENF Solar directory \| review \- https://www.solarfeeds.com/biz/kensol/ \| Kensol company overview, production capacity and Tier 1 status \| review \- https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group \| AEET Energy Group panel buyer guide - EnergyPal \| review Sources: \- \[AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet) \- \[Kensol - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/kensol) \- \[Kensol Company Overview - Solarfeeds\](https://www.solarfeeds.com/biz/kensol/) \- \[AEET Energy Group - EnergyPal Buyer's Guide\](https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group) \- \[KENSOL panels - Keno Energy\](https://web.keno-energy.com/en/producent/kensol/) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Kensol vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/kensol-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aeet) - [Kensol vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/kensol-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet) - [Kensol vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/kensol-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/kensol-vs-aeet Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.