---
title: "KDM Kingdom Solar vs AEET - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare KDM Kingdom Solar vs AEET solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/kdm-kingdom-solar-vs-aeet"
---

# KDM Kingdom Solar vs AEET

AEET has the broader catalog (5 vs 3 models). KDM Kingdom Solar leads on peak efficiency at 22.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | KDM Kingdom Solar | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China |  |
| Headquarters | Hefei |  |
| Founded | 2010 |  |
| Employees | 100 |  |
| Annual capacity | 1 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | no | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.kdmsolar.com](https://www.kdmsolar.com) |  |

KDM Kingdom Solar is a Chinese solar module manufacturer based in Hefei, Anhui Province. The company specializes in manufacturing monocrystalline solar panels for global markets.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | KDM Kingdom Solar | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 5 | +2 |
| Max Power | 590 W | 200 W | +390 W |
| Avg Power | 533 W | 190 W | +343 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | KDM Kingdom Solar | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.80% | 15.70% | +7.10 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.46% | 14.90% | +7.56 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | KDM Kingdom Solar | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.290%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |  |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +5.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | KDM Kingdom Solar | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22-23% | 3 (100.0%) | 0 |
| \<20% | 0 | 5 (100.0%) |


## Power distribution


| Power band | KDM Kingdom Solar | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 2 (66.7%) | 0 |
| \<400W | 0 | 5 (100.0%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)


| Technology | KDM Kingdom Solar | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| N-type | 3 (100.0%) | 0 |
| PERC | 0 | 5 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, KDM Kingdom Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [KD-M590-144-N](https://comparepv.com/panel/kdm-kingdom-solar-kd-m590-144-n) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [KD-M570-144-N](https://comparepv.com/panel/kdm-kingdom-solar-kd-m570-144-n) | 570 | 22.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [KD-M440-108-N](https://comparepv.com/panel/kingdom-kd-m440-108-n) | 440 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AEET


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AEET Energy Group GmbH is a Germany-based photovoltaic wholesaler and service provider whose own-brand panel portfolio is small and leans heavily toward legacy power classes, whereas KDM Kingdom Solar - formally Zhejiang Kingdom Solar Energy Technic Co., Ltd. - is a Chinese module manufacturer founded in 2010 with a stated annual production capacity of 1 GW and roughly 100 employees. Neither company holds Tier 1 bankable status as defined by BloombergNEF, meaning neither has independently financed enough utility-scale projects with a sufficient number of lenders to earn that institutional endorsement. KDM's larger manufacturing footprint and broader international distribution give it a meaningfully stronger commercial presence, even if it remains well outside the top tier occupied by names like JinkoSolar or LONGi.

The portfolio numbers tell a stark story. AEET's five-panel lineup averages just 190 Wp and 14.9% efficiency, topping out at 200 Wp and 15.7% - performance figures consistent with older polycrystalline or low-grade monocrystalline cells from roughly a decade ago. Cell technology is unconfirmed, and no bifacial options exist. The 25-year average warranty is standard but unremarkable given the power class. KDM, by contrast, has moved entirely to N-type cell technology - most likely TOPCon - achieving an average of 580 Wp and 22.435% efficiency, with a peak at 590 Wp and 22.8%. Its average temperature coefficient of -0.29% per degree Celsius is competitive for N-type modules, and the 30-year average warranty reflects growing industry confidence in this cell chemistry.

For any buyer evaluating these two in 2025, the choice is not genuinely close. KDM's N-type panels suit residential rooftops where space is limited and high efficiency matters, as well as small commercial installations seeking modern specifications at mid-market pricing. AEET's current lineup, with its sub-200 Wp ceiling and unknown cell technology, is difficult to recommend for new projects - its panels belong to a performance tier that the broader market has largely moved past. Buyers who require Tier 1 bankability for project finance should look elsewhere entirely, but between these two, KDM is the clearly stronger option on every technical metric.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar manufacturer profile \| review

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/kingdom-solar \| KDM Kingdom Solar - ENF Solar manufacturer profile \| review

\- https://www.kingdomsolar.net/html/en/index.php?ac=article&at=read&did=235 \| KDM Kingdom Solar N-type 570-580W 182 Series product page \| article

\- https://www.renvu.com/blogs/learn/solar-panel-bankability-and-the-tier-1-list \| Solar Panel Bankability and the Tier 1 List - RENVU \| article

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/tsunami-chinese-solar-company-insolvencies-pv-tech-bankability-report/ \| PV Tech Bankability Report - Chinese solar insolvencies 2025 \| article

Sources:

\- \[AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet)

\- \[KDM Kingdom Solar - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/kingdom-solar)

\- \[KDM N-type 570-580W product page\](https://www.kingdomsolar.net/html/en/index.php?ac=article&at=read&did=235)

\- \[Solar Panel Bankability and the Tier 1 List - RENVU\](https://www.renvu.com/blogs/learn/solar-panel-bankability-and-the-tier-1-list)

\- \[PV Tech Bankability Report - Chinese solar insolvencies 2025\](https://www.pv-tech.org/tsunami-chinese-solar-company-insolvencies-pv-tech-bankability-report/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [KDM Kingdom Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/kdm-kingdom-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aeet)
- [KDM Kingdom Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/kdm-kingdom-solar-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [KDM Kingdom Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/kdm-kingdom-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/kdm-kingdom-solar-vs-aeet

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.