---
title: "Jshine Solar Technology vs AEET - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jshine Solar Technology vs AEET solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jshine-solar-technology-vs-aeet"
---

# Jshine Solar Technology vs AEET

Jshine Solar Technology leads on peak efficiency at 21.96%. Jshine Solar Technology leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jshine Solar Technology | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China |  |
| Headquarters | Shanghai |  |
| Founded | 2014 |  |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.jshinesolar.com](https://www.jshinesolar.com) |  |

Jshine Solar Technology Co., Ltd., established in 2014 in Shanghai, China, is a solar solution provider. They focus on residential and ground-mounted power plants, offering modules, inverters, distribution boxes, and mounting systems. The company has expanded to include Jshine Solar Hong Kong Limited as its global...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jshine Solar Technology | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 5 | 5 |  |
| Max Power | 400 W | 200 W | +200 W |
| Avg Power | 390 W | 190 W | +200 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jshine Solar Technology | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 21.96% | 15.70% | +6.26 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.41% | 14.90% | +6.51 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jshine Solar Technology | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 5 (100%) | 0 (0%) | +100 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +5.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | Jshine Solar Technology | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 1 (20.0%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 4 (80.0%) | 0 |
| \<20% | 0 | 5 (100.0%) |


## Power distribution


| Power band | Jshine Solar Technology | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 4 (80.0%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| 400-499W | 1 (20.0%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)


| Technology | Jshine Solar Technology | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 5 (100.0%) | 0 |
| PERC | 0 | 5 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, Jshine Solar Technology


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JS 380~400W 120M6 HJT DG (400W class)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jshine-solar-technology-js-380-400w-120m6-hjt-dg-400w-class) | 400 | 22.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JS 380~400W 120M6 HJT DG (395W class)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jshine-solar-technology-js-380-400w-120m6-hjt-dg-395w-class) | 395 | 21.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JS 380~400W 120M6 HJT DG (390W class)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jshine-solar-technology-js-380-400w-120m6-hjt-dg-390w-class) | 390 | 21.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JS 380~400W 120M6 HJT DG (385W class)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jshine-solar-technology-js-380-400w-120m6-hjt-dg-385w-class) | 385 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JS 380~400W 120M6 HJT DG (380W class)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jshine-solar-technology-js-380-400w-120m6-hjt-dg-380w-class) | 380 | 20.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AEET


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AEET is a solar panel manufacturer with limited publicly available information - no founding year, headquarters country, production capacity in gigawatts, or Tier 1 bankable status has been confirmed in any major industry database, including the Bloomberg NEF rankings. Jshine Solar Technology, founded in 2014 and headquartered in China, is a more traceable entity, with panel datasheets documented in the ENF Solar directory and a clear specialization in heterojunction (HJT) bifacial modules. Neither company holds Tier 1 bankable status, and neither appears to be exchange-listed, but Jshine's verifiable founding history and published technical specifications give it a marginally stronger institutional footprint of the two.

The product portfolios of the two manufacturers occupy entirely different performance tiers. AEET's five-panel lineup averages 190 Wp and 14.9% efficiency, reaching a maximum of 200 Wp and 15.7% - figures that lag well behind the current commercial mainstream. Cell technology is unspecified, no bifacial configurations are offered, and the standard warranty runs 25 years. This profile fits low-demand, budget-oriented applications such as small off-grid systems or entry-level commercial installs where cost per watt outweighs energy density. Jshine Solar Technology's five-panel range averages 390 Wp and 21.41% efficiency, peaking at 400 Wp and 21.96%, with a temperature coefficient of -0.24%/°C - on par with the best-performing HJT modules on the market. Every panel in the Jshine portfolio is bifacial, capturing additional rear-side irradiance, and the warranty extends to 30 years, five years longer than AEET's coverage.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Jshine Solar Technology is the more capable option by a wide margin - the HJT cell technology, 100% bifacial design, average efficiency of 21.41%, and 30-year warranty collectively serve premium residential rooftops and commercial ground-mount projects far better than AEET's unspecified cell technology at 14.9% average efficiency. The two are not interchangeable for the same application. Buyers financing utility-scale or institutional projects should note that neither manufacturer is Tier 1 bankable, which may create hurdles with project lenders regardless of the product selected.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/jshine-solar-technology \| Jshine Solar Technology - ENF Solar company profile \| review

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/pv/panel-datasheet/crystalline/64362 \| Jshine JS-380-400W HJT DG panel datasheet - ENF Solar \| review

\- https://www.sunhub.com/blog/hjt-vs-topcon-solar-panels-whats-the-difference/ \| HJT vs TOPCon solar panels: key differences explained \| article

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar/bankability-what-is-it-how-do-you-assess-it/ \| What is solar panel bankability and how is it assessed? - EnergySage \| article

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jshine Solar Technology vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jshine-solar-technology-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aeet)
- [Jshine Solar Technology vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/jshine-solar-technology-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [Jshine Solar Technology vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/jshine-solar-technology-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jshine-solar-technology-vs-aeet

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.