---
title: "JS Solar vs Vikram Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare JS Solar vs Vikram Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/js-solar-vs-vikram-solar"
---

# JS Solar vs Vikram Solar

Vikram Solar has the broader catalog (202 vs 137 models). Vikram Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.69%. Vikram Solar leans bifacial (74% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | JS Solar | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | India |
| Headquarters | Jinhua | Kolkata |
| Founded | 2011 | 2005 |
| Employees |  | 1,895 |
| Annual capacity |  | 9.5 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | NSE, BSE: VIKRAMSOLR |
| Website | [https://www.jssolar.com](https://www.jssolar.com) | [http://www.vikramsolar.com](http://www.vikramsolar.com) |

Vikram Solar Limited is a leading Indian solar photovoltaic (PV) module manufacturer and solar solutions provider. They offer engineering, procurement, construction (EPC), and operations & maintenance (O&M) services for solar plants. The company manufactures high-efficiency solar PV modules and has a pan-India...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | JS Solar | Vikram Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 137 | 202 | +65 |
| Max Power | 670 W | 735 W | +65 W |
| Avg Power | 430 W | 553 W | +123 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | JS Solar | Vikram Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.45% | 23.69% | +1.24 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.03% | 21.45% | +1.41 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | JS Solar | Vikram Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.335%/°C | -0.334%/°C | +0.001 |
| Bifacial Share | 12 (9%) | 150 (74%) | +65 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.1 yrs | 28.6 yrs | +3.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Vikram Solar skews to higher efficiency: 8% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | JS Solar | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 44 (32.1%) | 11 (5.4%) |
| 20-21% | 49 (35.8%) | 42 (20.8%) |
| 21-22% | 38 (27.7%) | 106 (52.5%) |
| 22-23% | 6 (4.4%) | 27 (13.4%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 16 (7.9%) |


## Power distribution

Vikram Solar offers more 600W+ panels (42% of lineup)


| Power band | JS Solar | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 54 (39.4%) | 12 (5.9%) |
| 400-499W | 44 (32.1%) | 54 (26.7%) |
| 500-599W | 32 (23.4%) | 52 (25.7%) |
| 600-699W | 7 (5.1%) | 69 (34.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 15 (7.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (39%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (75%)


| Technology | JS Solar | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 76 (55.5%) | 0 |
| PERC | 53 (38.7%) | 152 (75.2%) |
| TOPCon | 8 (5.8%) | 8 (4.0%) |
| N-type | 0 | 30 (14.9%) |
| HJT | 0 | 12 (5.9%) |


## Top panels, JS Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JS210MHC132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JS210MHC132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JS210MHC132-660](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc132-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JS210MHC132-655](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc132-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JS210MHC132-650](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc132-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JS210MHC120-605](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc120-605) | 605 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JS210MHC120-600](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc120-600) | 600 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JS210MHC120-595](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc120-595) | 595 | 21.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JS210MHC120-590](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc120-590) | 590 | 20.8 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JS210MHC120-585](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc120-585) | 585 | 20.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Vikram Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-735-05) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-730-05) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-725-05) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-720-05) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-715-05) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-715-05) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-710-05) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-710-05) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

JS Solar, formally Yixing JS Solar Co., Ltd, is a Chinese cell and module manufacturer headquartered in Wuxi, Jiangsu province, active in the solar sector since 2004 and operating its own production base since 2007. The company states a production capacity of around 20 GW, though actual annual module shipments are reported in the low single-digit GW range, placing it among mid-tier Chinese suppliers rather than the largest global brands, and clear, independent confirmation of current Tier 1 status was not found. Vikram Solar, based in Kolkata, India, was founded in 2006 and re-entered BloombergNEF's Tier 1 module manufacturer list in 2024, with nameplate module capacity that has grown to roughly 9.5 GW following new plants such as Vallam and Gangaikondan. On institutional footprint and verifiable bankability, Vikram Solar currently holds the stronger position.

JS Solar's catalog spans monocrystalline modules from roughly 200W to 670W, with a modest share of bifacial panels, positioning it as a flexible option for residential rooftop and smaller commercial installations. Vikram Solar has been shifting its newer capacity toward N-type TOPCon technology, with Hypersol TOPCon modules rated at 615-640W and efficiencies up to about 23.7 percent, alongside its first HJT module launches, reflecting a stronger push into utility-scale ground-mount and higher-yield commercial and industrial (C&I) projects.

For an international buyer choosing between the two, Vikram Solar's confirmed Tier 1 bankability and larger, TOPCon-oriented manufacturing base make it the more defensible default for utility-scale or bank-financed projects, while JS Solar can be a reasonable choice for smaller residential or commercial jobs where formal Tier 1 documentation and long-term institutional track record matter less; the two brands are not strictly interchangeable given this bankability gap.

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [JS Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/js-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Vikram Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-vikram-solar)
- [JS Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/js-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Vikram Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-vikram-solar)
- [JS Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/js-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Vikram Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-vikram-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/js-solar-vs-vikram-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.