---
title: "JS Solar vs Seraphim - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare JS Solar vs Seraphim solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/js-solar-vs-seraphim"
---

# JS Solar vs Seraphim

Seraphim has the broader catalog (160 vs 137 models). Seraphim leads on peak efficiency at 23.50%. Seraphim leans bifacial (69% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | JS Solar | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Jinhua | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2011 | 2011 |
| Employees |  | 1001-5000 |
| Annual capacity |  | 13 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.jssolar.com](https://www.jssolar.com) | [https://www.seraphim-energy.com](https://www.seraphim-energy.com) |

Seraphim is a world-class solar products manufacturer specializing in research, development, production, and sales of solar PV products. The company has achieved significant milestones, outpacing competitors in production capacity and innovative designs. Seraphim is committed to technological innovation and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | JS Solar | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 137 | 160 | +23 |
| Max Power | 670 W | 730 W | +60 W |
| Avg Power | 430 W | 549 W | +119 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | JS Solar | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.45% | 23.50% | +1.05 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.03% | 21.82% | +1.79 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | JS Solar | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.335%/°C | -0.316%/°C | +0.019 |
| Bifacial Share | 12 (9%) | 111 (69%) | +61 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.1 yrs | 28.8 yrs | +3.6 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Seraphim skews to higher efficiency: 12% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | JS Solar | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 44 (32.1%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 49 (35.8%) | 32 (20.0%) |
| 21-22% | 38 (27.7%) | 58 (36.2%) |
| 22-23% | 6 (4.4%) | 51 (31.9%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 19 (11.9%) |


## Power distribution

Seraphim offers more 600W+ panels (35% of lineup)


| Power band | JS Solar | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 54 (39.4%) | 2 (1.2%) |
| 400-499W | 44 (32.1%) | 55 (34.4%) |
| 500-599W | 32 (23.4%) | 47 (29.4%) |
| 600-699W | 7 (5.1%) | 45 (28.1%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 11 (6.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (39%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (52%)


| Technology | JS Solar | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 76 (55.5%) | 0 |
| PERC | 53 (38.7%) | 84 (52.5%) |
| TOPCon | 8 (5.8%) | 66 (41.2%) |
| HJT | 0 | 6 (3.8%) |
| N-type | 0 | 4 (2.5%) |


## Top panels, JS Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JS210MHC132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JS210MHC132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JS210MHC132-660](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc132-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JS210MHC132-655](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc132-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JS210MHC132-650](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc132-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JS210MHC120-605](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc120-605) | 605 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JS210MHC120-600](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc120-600) | 600 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JS210MHC120-595](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc120-595) | 595 | 21.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JS210MHC120-590](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc120-590) | 590 | 20.8 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JS210MHC120-585](https://comparepv.com/panel/js-solar-js210mhc120-585) | 585 | 20.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Seraphim


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SRP-730-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-730-bhc-bg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SRP-725-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-725-bhc-bg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SRP-720-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-bhc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SRP-720-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-btc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SRP-715-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-bhc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SRP-715-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-btc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SRP-710-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-bhc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SRP-710-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-btc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SRP-705-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-bhc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SRP-705-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-btc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Other comparisons

- [JS Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/js-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-seraphim)
- [JS Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/js-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-seraphim)
- [JS Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/js-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-seraphim)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/js-solar-vs-seraphim

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.