---
title: "Jolywood vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jolywood vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jolywood-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Jolywood vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 128 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jolywood leans bifacial (86% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jolywood | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Taizhou | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2008 | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 300393 |  |
| Website | [https://www.jolywood.cn](https://www.jolywood.cn) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jolywood | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 128 | 340 | +212 |
| Max Power | 715 W | 760 W | +45 W |
| Avg Power | 554 W | 520 W | +33 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jolywood | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.60% | 24.80% | +1.20 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.54% | 21.71% | +0.83 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jolywood | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.284%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.018 |
| Bifacial Share | 110 (86%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jolywood | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 11 (8.6%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 89 (69.5%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 28 (21.9%) | 76 (22.4%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |


## Power distribution

Jolywood offers more 600W+ panels (38% of lineup)


| Power band | Jolywood | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 42 (32.8%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 38 (29.7%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 40 (31.2%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 8 (6.2%) | 44 (12.9%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (95%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Jolywood | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 122 (95.3%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| N-type | 6 (4.7%) | 6 (1.8%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |


## Top panels, Jolywood


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JW-HD132N-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JW-HD132N-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JW-HD132N-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JW-HD132N-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JW-HD132N-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JW-HD132N-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JW-HD132N-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JW-HD132N-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JW-HD132N-695](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-695) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JW-HD132N-695W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-695w) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jolywood is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2008 and headquartered in Changshu, Jiangsu Province. Listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange since 2014, it has established itself as one of the early commercial pioneers of N-type TOPCon cell technology. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status and operates a cell production capacity of approximately 20 GW, with module output around 10 GW per year. Trina Solar traces its roots to 1997, when founder Gao Jifan established the company in Changzhou, also in Jiangsu Province. Listed on Shanghai's STAR Market, Trina has grown into one of the world's largest solar module suppliers, shipping over 70 GW in 2024 alone and surpassing 292 GW in cumulative global shipments by mid-2025. Both brands carry BloombergNEF Tier 1 status, but Trina Solar's scale, tenure, and breadth of global distribution give it a considerably stronger institutional footprint.

Jolywood has built its reputation around bifacial N-type TOPCon modules. The NIWA series is well regarded in the European residential rooftop segment, delivering efficiencies in the range of 22-23% in a compact format suited to home installations. The JW192R series uses rectangular-cut wafers to push output higher and targets commercial rooftops and medium-scale ground-mount projects. Trina Solar organizes its portfolio around the Vertex platform. The Vertex S+ G3 addresses residential and commercial rooftop applications using N-type i-TOPCon cells, while the Vertex N and the newer Vertex N G3 target utility-scale ground-mount installations at outputs reaching up to 760 W. Trina's i-TOPCon cells have recorded a lab conversion efficiency of 26.58%, and the Vertex N TOPCon Ultra line extends that technology into large-format commercial and industrial deployments.

For most international buyers, Trina Solar is the lower-risk default: its longer track record, wider installer ecosystem, and more established after-sales infrastructure reduce project exposure, particularly on utility-scale or long-horizon investments. Jolywood is a credible alternative - especially for buyers seeking a specialist N-type TOPCon focus or competitive pricing in the European residential market. The quality gap between the two brands is not wide, and both perform well in independent reliability assessments, so buyers already working with a trusted Jolywood supply chain have no compelling technical reason to switch.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jolywood vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jolywood-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Jolywood vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jolywood-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Jolywood vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jolywood-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jolywood-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.