---
title: "Jolywood vs Seraphim - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jolywood vs Seraphim solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jolywood-vs-seraphim"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/jolywood/seraphim.png"
---

# Jolywood vs Seraphim

Seraphim has the broader catalog (160 vs 128 models). Jolywood leads on peak efficiency at 23.60%. Jolywood leans bifacial (86% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jolywood | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Taizhou | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2008 | 2011 |
| Employees |  | 1001-5000 |
| Annual capacity |  | 13 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 300393 |  |
| Website | [https://www.jolywood.cn](https://www.jolywood.cn) | [https://www.seraphim-energy.com](https://www.seraphim-energy.com) |

Seraphim is a world-class solar products manufacturer specializing in research, development, production, and sales of solar PV products. The company has achieved significant milestones, outpacing competitors in production capacity and innovative designs. Seraphim is committed to technological innovation and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jolywood | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 128 | 160 | +32 |
| Max Power | 715 W | 730 W | +15 W |
| Avg Power | 554 W | 549 W | +4 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jolywood | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.60% | 23.50% | +0.10 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.54% | 21.82% | +0.72 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jolywood | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.284%/°C | -0.316%/°C | +0.032 |
| Bifacial Share | 110 (86%) | 111 (69%) | +17 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.8 yrs | +1.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jolywood skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jolywood | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 11 (8.6%) | 58 (36.2%) |
| 22-23% | 89 (69.5%) | 51 (31.9%) |
| 23%+ | 28 (21.9%) | 19 (11.9%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 32 (20.0%) |


## Power distribution

Jolywood offers more 600W+ panels (38% of lineup)


| Power band | Jolywood | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 42 (32.8%) | 55 (34.4%) |
| 500-599W | 38 (29.7%) | 47 (29.4%) |
| 600-699W | 40 (31.2%) | 45 (28.1%) |
| 700W+ | 8 (6.2%) | 11 (6.9%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 2 (1.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (95%)

Dominant cell tech: PERC (52%)


| Technology | Jolywood | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 122 (95.3%) | 66 (41.2%) |
| N-type | 6 (4.7%) | 4 (2.5%) |
| PERC | 0 | 84 (52.5%) |
| HJT | 0 | 6 (3.8%) |


## Top panels, Jolywood


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JW-HD132N-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JW-HD132N-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JW-HD132N-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JW-HD132N-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JW-HD132N-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JW-HD132N-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JW-HD132N-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JW-HD132N-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JW-HD132N-695](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-695) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JW-HD132N-695W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-695w) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Seraphim


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SRP-730-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-730-bhc-bg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SRP-725-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-725-bhc-bg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SRP-720-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-bhc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SRP-720-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-btc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SRP-715-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-bhc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SRP-715-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-btc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SRP-710-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-bhc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SRP-710-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-btc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SRP-705-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-bhc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SRP-705-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-btc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Other comparisons

- [Jolywood vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jolywood-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-seraphim)
- [Jolywood vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jolywood-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-seraphim)
- [Jolywood vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jolywood-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-seraphim)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jolywood-vs-seraphim

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.