---
title: "Jolywood vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jolywood vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jolywood-vs-q-cells"
---

# Jolywood vs Q-Cells

Jolywood has the broader catalog (128 vs 89 models). Jolywood leads on peak efficiency at 23.60%. Jolywood leans bifacial (86% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jolywood | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Taizhou | Seoul |
| Founded | 2008 | 1999 |
| Employees |  | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 300393 | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website | [https://www.jolywood.cn](https://www.jolywood.cn) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jolywood | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 128 | 89 | +39 |
| Max Power | 715 W | 675 W | +40 W |
| Avg Power | 554 W | 468 W | +85 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jolywood | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.60% | 23.20% | +0.40 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.54% | 21.21% | +1.33 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jolywood | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.284%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.041 |
| Bifacial Share | 110 (86%) | 35 (39%) | +47 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +3.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jolywood skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jolywood | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 11 (8.6%) | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 89 (69.5%) | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 28 (21.9%) | 2 (2.2%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 7 (7.9%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 29 (32.6%) |


## Power distribution

Jolywood offers more 600W+ panels (38% of lineup)


| Power band | Jolywood | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 42 (32.8%) | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 38 (29.7%) | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 40 (31.2%) | 17 (19.1%) |
| 700W+ | 8 (6.2%) | 0 |
| \<400W | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (95%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Jolywood | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 122 (95.3%) | 8 (9.0%) |
| N-type | 6 (4.7%) | 23 (25.8%) |
| PERC | 0 | 38 (42.7%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |


## Top panels, Jolywood


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JW-HD132N-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JW-HD132N-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JW-HD132N-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JW-HD132N-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JW-HD132N-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JW-HD132N-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JW-HD132N-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JW-HD132N-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JW-HD132N-695](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-695) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JW-HD132N-695W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-695w) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jolywood is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2008 and headquartered in Changshu, Jiangsu Province, that built its identity around n-type TOPCon cell technology as early as 2016 - well before most rivals committed to it. The company holds a confirmed position on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list and reports a cell and module capacity exceeding 3 GW. Q-Cells traces its roots to a German startup founded in 1999, was acquired by South Korean conglomerate Hanwha in 2012, and operates today as Hanwha Qcells with global module capacity above 11 GW and projected shipments of roughly 9 GW in 2025. Qcells also holds Tier 1 status from both BloombergNEF and S&P Global, leads U.S. residential and commercial market share according to Wood Mackenzie, and secured a $1.45 billion DOE loan guarantee to anchor domestic manufacturing in Georgia. On institutional footprint and brand recognition, Qcells has a clear edge.

Jolywood's commercial catalogue centers on bifacial N-type TOPCon modules, including a 2025 launch of a reinforced-frame 570 W to 595 W glass-backsheet panel engineered for harsh-climate conditions such as high wind and snow loads. Its products are well suited to utility-scale ground mounts and demanding rooftop environments, though installer feedback in newer markets such as Australia remains thin. Qcells offers a broader product family under its Q.ANTUM NEO platform - covering premium residential rooftops, commercial flat-roof systems, and utility projects - with efficiency figures confirmed by independent reviewers in the 22.5% to 23.7% range for top-tier modules. The company backs its modules with a 25-year product warranty that guarantees at least 85% output retention over that period, a standard that reviewers consistently flag as a standout.

For most buyers in 2025, Qcells is the lower-risk default: deeper installer networks, well-documented field performance, domestic U.S. manufacturing, and strong warranty terms. Jolywood is a credible specialist choice for projects that specifically need high-efficiency bifacial TOPCon hardware and are comfortable with a newer market presence.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/02/27/jolywood-releases-595-w-bifacial-topcon-solar-panel-for-harsh-environments/ \| Jolywood releases 595 W bifacial TOPCon panel for harsh environments \| article

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/taking-topcon-to-top-runner-jolywood-president-lin-jianwei-talks-solar-n-type-cell-innovation/ \| Taking TOPCon to Top Runner - Jolywood president on n-type innovation \| article

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert review of Qcells solar panels 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.hanwha.com/newsroom/news/press-releases/hanwha-qcells-named-an-s-p-global-2025-tier-1-cleantech-company.do \| Hanwha Qcells named S&P Global 2025 Tier 1 cleantech company \| article

\- https://www.sailsolarpv.com/jolywood-continues-to-rank-among-bloombergs-tier-1-rankings \| Jolywood continues to rank in BloombergNEF Tier 1 rankings \| article

Sources:

\- \[Jolywood releases 595 W bifacial TOPCon solar panel for harsh environments\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/02/27/jolywood-releases-595-w-bifacial-topcon-solar-panel-for-harsh-environments/)

\- \[Taking TOPCon to Top Runner - Jolywood on n-type cell innovation\](https://www.pv-tech.org/taking-topcon-to-top-runner-jolywood-president-lin-jianwei-talks-solar-n-type-cell-innovation/)

\- \[Expert Review of Qcells Solar Panels 2025 - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review)

\- \[Hanwha Qcells named S&P Global 2025 Tier 1 Cleantech Company\](https://www.hanwha.com/newsroom/news/press-releases/hanwha-qcells-named-an-s-p-global-2025-tier-1-cleantech-company.do)

\- \[Jolywood continues to rank among BloombergNEF Tier 1 rankings\](https://www.sailsolarpv.com/jolywood-continues-to-rank-among-bloombergs-tier-1-rankings)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jolywood vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jolywood-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [Jolywood vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jolywood-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [Jolywood vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jolywood-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jolywood-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.