---
title: "Jinko Solar vs ZNShine - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs ZNShine solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-znshine"
---

# Jinko Solar vs ZNShine

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 212 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Suqian |
| Founded | 2006 | 1988 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 1,200 |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | 10 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS | NEEQ: 838463 |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [http://www.znshinesolar.com](http://www.znshinesolar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 212 | +425 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 670 W | +65 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 535 W | +12 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 22.83% | +1.97 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 21.35% | +0.83 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.329%/°C | +0.025 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 89 (42%) | +6 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 28.3 yrs | +0.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 5 (2.4%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 59 (27.8%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 101 (47.6%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 47 (22.2%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 6 (2.8%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 64 (30.2%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 99 (46.7%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 43 (20.3%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (63%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 78 (36.8%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 134 (63.2%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, ZNShine


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ZXM8-TP132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ZXM8-TP132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [ZXM8-TP132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [ZXM8-TP132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and ZNShine are both China-based, Tier 1 bankable solar module manufacturers, but they occupy very different positions in the global market. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, has grown into one of the world's largest photovoltaic manufacturers, with a production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce exceeding 33,000 employees. The company secured the top global ranking in module shipments in H1 2025 and has been a PVEL Top Performer for eleven consecutive years. ZNShine, by contrast, was founded much earlier - in 1988 - giving it a longer operating history, though it remains a significantly smaller player with a production capacity of 10 GW, approximately 1,200 employees, and a listing on China's NEEQ over-the-counter market rather than a major international exchange.

On the technology side, Jinko Solar's portfolio is increasingly built around N-type TOPCon cells, which account for roughly 39% of its 545-panel lineup and enable a maximum module efficiency of 24.8% and an average of 22.0%. The company's average temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C is notably better than ZNShine's -0.329%/°C, translating into stronger real-world output during hot weather - a meaningful advantage in utility-scale ground-mount and commercial C&I projects where annual energy yield drives return on investment. ZNShine's portfolio leans primarily on PERC technology (over 63% of its 212 panels), achieving a maximum efficiency of 22.83% and an average of 21.3%. Where ZNShine stands out is in its higher share of bifacial modules (42% of the lineup versus 32% for Jinko) and a higher average panel wattage of approximately 534 Wp, alongside a proprietary graphene-coated glass offering self-cleaning properties - a differentiator for large rooftop or agricultural installations in dusty or hard-to-access environments.

For international buyers and project developers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar offers stronger brand recognition, deeper financial backing, broader third-party certification data, and a clear technology roadmap anchored in TOPCon and beyond. ZNShine represents a credible value-oriented alternative for buyers who prioritize bifacial yield and lower upfront module cost and are comfortable with a smaller, less globally visible supplier. Both carry comparable product warranty terms - around 28 years on average - which partially closes the perceived quality gap for risk-tolerant buyers.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-znshine)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-znshine)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-znshine)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-znshine

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.