---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Vikram Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Vikram Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-vikram-solar"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Vikram Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 202 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Vikram Solar leans bifacial (74% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | India |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Kolkata |
| Founded | 2006 | 2005 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 1,895 |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | 9.5 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS | NSE, BSE: VIKRAMSOLR |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [http://www.vikramsolar.com](http://www.vikramsolar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Vikram Solar Limited is a leading Indian solar photovoltaic (PV) module manufacturer and solar solutions provider. They offer engineering, procurement, construction (EPC), and operations & maintenance (O&M) services for solar plants. The company manufactures high-efficiency solar PV modules and has a pan-India...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Vikram Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 202 | +435 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 735 W |  |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 553 W | +31 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Vikram Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.69% | +1.11 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 21.45% | +0.73 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Vikram Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.334%/°C | +0.029 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 150 (74%) | +38 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 28.6 yrs | +0.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 11 (5.4%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 42 (20.8%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 106 (52.5%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 27 (13.4%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 16 (7.9%) |


## Power distribution

Vikram Solar offers more 600W+ panels (42% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 12 (5.9%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 54 (26.7%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 52 (25.7%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 69 (34.2%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 15 (7.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (75%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 8 (4.0%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 30 (14.9%) |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 152 (75.2%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 12 (5.9%) |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Vikram Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-735-05) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-730-05) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-725-05) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-720-05) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-715-05) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-715-05) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-710-05) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-710-05) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, ranks among the world's largest solar module manufacturers, with a production capacity of 130 GW, approximately 33,830 employees, and a listing on the NYSE. The company has shipped over 300 GW of modules globally and has earned 11 consecutive PVEL Top Performer designations, cementing its reputation for manufacturing consistency. Vikram Solar, founded one year earlier in 2005 and headquartered in Kolkata, India, is the largest solar module manufacturer in India by installed capacity, with 9.5 GW of production capacity and around 1,895 employees, listed on both the NSE and BSE. Despite the significant difference in scale, both manufacturers hold Tier 1 bankable status, meaning both are considered low-risk investments by independent financial assessors.

Jinko Solar's portfolio of 545 modules is anchored by TOPCon technology - its leading cell type at 39.4% of the range - delivering an average module efficiency of 22.0%, a maximum of 24.8%, and a low temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C. This makes the Tiger NEO N-type series well suited for residential rooftop installations where space is limited and for utility-scale ground-mount projects where high energy yield per square meter drives returns. Vikram Solar's 143-module portfolio is predominantly PERC-based (70.6% of range), but stands out with a strikingly high bifacial share of 81% and an above-average power output of approximately 552 Wp per panel. Combined with a slightly longer average warranty of around 29 years versus Jinko's 28.5 years, this bifacial-heavy lineup is particularly well suited to utility-scale ground-mount and commercial C&I projects in regions with high ground albedo. Vikram has also been expanding its footprint in European and US markets, offering buyers a credible non-Chinese Tier 1 alternative.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar offers greater product breadth, established global supply chains, and a technology edge in TOPCon efficiency - making it a strong fit for projects of any scale where competitive pricing and broad availability are priorities. Vikram Solar is a compelling choice for utility-scale and C&I developers who value a bifacial-focused portfolio, solid warranty terms, and the supply chain diversification that comes with sourcing from a leading Indian manufacturer.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Vikram Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-vikram-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Vikram Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-vikram-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Vikram Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-vikram-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-vikram-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.