---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Viessmann - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Viessmann solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-viessmann"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Viessmann

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 11 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Viessmann |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Germany |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Allendorf |
| Founded | 2006 | 1917 |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.viessmann.com](https://www.viessmann.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Viessmann | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 11 | +626 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 405 W | +330 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 361 W | +162 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Viessmann | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 21.30% | +3.50 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 19.41% | +2.77 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Viessmann | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.362%/°C | +0.058 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 0 (0%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +3.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Viessmann |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 3 (27.3%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 6 (54.5%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 2 (18.2%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Viessmann |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 6 (54.5%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 5 (45.5%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (73%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Viessmann |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 8 (72.7%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 3 (27.3%) |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Viessmann


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [M405WE](https://comparepv.com/panel/viessmann-m405we) | 405 | 20.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [M405WK](https://comparepv.com/panel/viessmann-m405wk) | 405 | 20.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [M400WG](https://comparepv.com/panel/viessmann-m400wg) | 400 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [M400WE](https://comparepv.com/panel/viessmann-m400we) | 400 | 20.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [M400WK](https://comparepv.com/panel/viessmann-m400wk) | 400 | 20.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [M395WG](https://comparepv.com/panel/viessmann-m395wg) | 395 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [M395WK](https://comparepv.com/panel/viessmann-m395wk) | 395 | 20.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [M390WG](https://comparepv.com/panel/viessmann-m390wg) | 390 | 20.8 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [P265PGHC](https://comparepv.com/panel/viessmann-p265pghc) | 265 | 16.3 | -0.420 | Polycrystalline |
| 10 | [P260PGHC](https://comparepv.com/panel/viessmann-p260pghc) | 260 | 16.0 | -0.420 | Polycrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Viessmann occupy fundamentally different positions in the solar energy landscape. Jinko Solar was founded in 2006 in China and has grown into one of the world's largest photovoltaic module manufacturers, with a production capacity of 130 GW, a workforce of over 33,000 employees, confirmed Tier 1 bankable status, and a listing on the New York Stock Exchange. The company's portfolio spans 545 panel models and covers markets across Asia, Europe, the Americas, and beyond. Viessmann, by contrast, is a German energy systems company with over a century of history, founded in 1917 and long established as a leader in heating technology, boilers, and heat pumps. Its photovoltaic offering under the Vitovolt brand is a secondary product line - the company lists only 3 PV module models, holds no Tier 1 bankable status, and its panels reach a maximum power of 265 Wp and a maximum efficiency of 16.3%, compared to Jinko's 735 Wp peak and 24.8% maximum efficiency.

Jinko Solar's technology strengths are anchored in its N-type TOPCon cell lineup, which accounts for nearly 40% of its portfolio and delivers an average module efficiency of around 22%. A low average temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C ensures strong real-world performance in variable climates. With nearly 32% of its range comprising bifacial panels, Jinko is well-positioned for utility-scale ground-mount projects, large commercial and industrial C&I installations, and high-yield residential rooftop systems where energy output per square meter matters. An average product warranty of approximately 28.5 years further reinforces its appeal for long-term investment cases. Viessmann's Vitovolt modules, averaging 260 Wp and 16% efficiency with a temperature coefficient of -0.42%/°C and no bifacial options, are best suited for homeowners seeking a fully integrated single-brand ecosystem combining solar PV with Viessmann heat pumps and energy storage - a scenario where system simplicity and service continuity take priority over maximizing energy yield.

For international buyers - whether installers, project developers, or procurement teams - Jinko Solar is the clear choice for any performance-driven application at residential, commercial, or utility scale, supported by Tier 1 bankability, a comprehensive and technologically advanced product catalog, and an independently validated manufacturing track record. Viessmann's PV modules are best understood as a complementary component within a broader Viessmann system installation rather than a standalone panel supplier, and are unlikely to be competitive in procurement processes where module efficiency, bifaciality, or bankability are evaluation criteria.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Viessmann](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-viessmann)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Viessmann](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-viessmann)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Viessmann](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-viessmann)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-viessmann

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.