---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Trina Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 340 models).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2006 | 1997 |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 340 | +297 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 760 W | +25 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 520 W | +2 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 21.71% | +0.46 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.002 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 145 (43%) | +6 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +0.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 6 (1.8%) |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 11 (3.2%) |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, is the world's largest solar module manufacturer by shipment volume, reporting a production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of over 33,800 employees. Trina Solar, established in 1997 and therefore one of the industry's longer-standing players, ranks among the top three global module producers with an estimated 11% market share - trailing Jinko's approximately 13% market leadership. Both companies are headquartered in China, hold Tier 1 (bankable) status, and have built extensive global distribution networks supplying markets across Asia, Europe, and the Americas. Jinko's NYSE listing provides an additional layer of financial transparency that some project financiers and institutional buyers find valuable when assessing counterparty risk.

Both manufacturers have made TOPCon n-type cell technology the cornerstone of their current strategies, but the depth of that commitment differs meaningfully at the portfolio level. Trina Solar's catalog is heavily weighted toward TOPCon, with approximately 69.8% of its 305 listed panels using this cell type, compared to 39.4% of Jinko's significantly larger 545-panel catalog. Jinko's peak module efficiency reaches 24.8% with an average portfolio efficiency of 22.0%, while Trina's peak stands at 24.1% with an average of 21.5%. Trina holds a clear edge in bifacial adoption, with 39.0% of its panels offering bifacial design versus 31.9% for Jinko - an advantage that translates into measurable yield gains for utility-scale ground-mount installations where rear-side albedo contribution is significant. Jinko's broader catalog and unmatched production scale give it a structural advantage for large commercial C&I and utility-scale procurements requiring guaranteed high-volume delivery on tight schedules. For residential rooftop installs, both brands offer competitive products with near-identical average temperature coefficients (-0.308 vs. -0.304 %/°C) and comparable warranty terms averaging 28.5 and 28.1 years respectively.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision largely comes down to project type and procurement priorities. Jinko Solar's unmatched production scale, NYSE listing, and the broadest available product range make it the lower-risk choice for large-volume, bankability-sensitive, or supply-constrained projects. Trina Solar's deeper TOPCon penetration across its portfolio and higher bifacial ratio position it as a strong contender for ground-mount solar farms and projects where maximizing energy yield per panel is the primary objective. Both brands carry strong third-party quality certifications and Tier 1 bankability, making either a defensible specification for developers, EPCs, and installers worldwide.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.