---
title: "Jinko Solar vs TPL Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs TPL Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-tpl-solar"
---

# Jinko Solar vs TPL Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 113 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | TPL Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Pakistan |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Lahore |
| Founded | 2006 |  |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.tplsolar.com](https://www.tplsolar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | TPL Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 113 | +524 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 670 W | +65 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 288 W | +235 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | TPL Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 21.67% | +3.13 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 16.94% | +5.24 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | TPL Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.359%/°C | +0.054 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 0 (0%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +1.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | TPL Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 99 (87.6%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 7 (6.2%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 7 (6.2%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | TPL Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 97 (85.8%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 6 (5.3%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 5 (4.4%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 5 (4.4%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (95%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | TPL Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 107 (94.7%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 6 (5.3%) |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, TPL Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TPL670M-132HC](https://comparepv.com/panel/tpl-solar-tpl670m-132hc) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TPL665M-132HC](https://comparepv.com/panel/tpl-solar-tpl665m-132hc) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TPL660M-132HC](https://comparepv.com/panel/tpl-solar-tpl660m-132hc) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TPL655M-132HC](https://comparepv.com/panel/tpl-solar-tpl655m-132hc) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TPL650M-132HC](https://comparepv.com/panel/tpl-solar-tpl650m-132hc) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TPL560M-144HC](https://comparepv.com/panel/tpl-solar-tpl560m-144hc) | 560 | 21.7 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TPL550M-144HC](https://comparepv.com/panel/tpl-solar-tpl550m-144hc) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TPL545M-144HC](https://comparepv.com/panel/tpl-solar-tpl545m-144hc) | 545 | 21.1 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TPL540M-144HC](https://comparepv.com/panel/tpl-solar-tpl540m-144hc) | 540 | 20.9 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TPL535M-144HC](https://comparepv.com/panel/tpl-solar-tpl535m-144hc) | 535 | 20.7 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, is one of the world's largest solar module manufacturers. Listed on the New York Stock Exchange and employing over 33,800 people, the company has a cumulative production capacity of 130 GW and holds Tier 1 bankable status - a widely recognized benchmark of financial stability and manufacturing reliability used by project finance institutions globally. With a portfolio spanning 545 panel models and shipments to over 160 countries, Jinko Solar competes across every market segment worldwide. TPL Solar, by contrast, is a Pakistan-based manufacturer without Tier 1 bankable status. Its catalog of 113 models is primarily oriented toward the domestic Pakistani market, with limited distribution reach into international or European markets. The company's smaller scale and regional focus place it in a fundamentally different competitive tier.

Jinko Solar's technical portfolio is anchored by TOPCon N-type cell technology, accounting for approximately 39% of its lineup, with panels reaching up to 735 Wp and a maximum efficiency of 24.8%. The average portfolio efficiency stands at 22.0%, and the average temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C is well suited to climates with high seasonal temperature variability. Nearly 32% of Jinko's portfolio consists of bifacial panels, making the brand particularly competitive for utility-scale ground-mount projects, commercial and industrial rooftop systems, and high-performance residential installations. TPL Solar's lineup is built predominantly on PERC technology - nearly 95% of the catalog - with an average panel power of 288 Wp and an average efficiency of 16.9%. The maximum efficiency reaches 21.67%, the temperature coefficient averages -0.359%/°C, and no bifacial panels are offered. TPL Solar's 30-year average product warranty is a marginal positive but does not offset the gap in technology generation or portfolio breadth.

For international buyers - including European project developers and installers in Poland - Jinko Solar is the clear choice for any project requiring bankable references, high-efficiency modules, and access to project finance. Its Tier 1 status, manufacturing scale, and leadership in TOPCon technology make it suitable for projects of any size. TPL Solar addresses a different demand segment: price-sensitive buyers in developing markets where Tier 1 certification and bifacial capability are secondary considerations. Buyers in the European Union would face significant challenges securing bank financing for installations using non-Tier 1 equipment, which effectively limits TPL Solar's applicability in those markets.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs TPL Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-tpl-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs TPL Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-tpl-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs TPL Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-tpl-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-tpl-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.