---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Topsky Energy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Topsky Energy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-topsky-energy"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Topsky Energy

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Topsky Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Shenzhen |
| Founded | 2006 | 1998 |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | \<1 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.topskyenergy.com](https://www.topskyenergy.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Shenzhen Topsky Energy Co., Ltd. is a Chinese manufacturer of solar cells and photovoltaic modules, including lightweight and customized panels. The company operates production facilities in Zhejiang and Jiangsu provinces, with sales and marketing based in Shenzhen and Hong Kong. Its products are distributed to over...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Topsky Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 0 | +637 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 0 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 0 W | +523 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Topsky Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Topsky Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 0 (0%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Topsky Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Topsky Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Topsky Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Topsky Energy are both Chinese solar panel manufacturers, but they occupy vastly different positions in the global photovoltaic industry. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, has grown into one of the world's largest module producers, with an annual module production capacity of 130 GW and cumulative shipments surpassing 350 GW worldwide as of mid-2025. The company holds Bloomberg Tier 1 bankable status - the only manufacturer to achieve a 100% bankability rating in 2024 - and commands approximately 13% global market share, ranking first in module shipments in the first half of 2025. Topsky Energy, established in 1998 and headquartered in Shenzhen, operates at a much smaller scale with production capacity below 1 GW and does not carry Tier 1 bankable status. While Topsky holds TUV Rhineland and CE certifications and claims a distribution presence in over 150 countries, it remains largely absent from major independent industry databases and analyst rankings, making independent verification of its capabilities difficult.

Jinko Solar's portfolio spans 545 panel models, with a maximum output of 735 Wp and a maximum module efficiency of 24.8%, driven by its N-type TOPCon Tiger Neo series. The average efficiency across its lineup stands at approximately 22%, and the low average temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C ensures reliable performance under thermal stress - a relevant factor for utility-scale ground-mount projects where energy yield optimization matters. With approximately 31.9% of its portfolio being bifacial, Jinko is well positioned for large commercial C&I and utility-scale projects where bifacial gain translates directly into improved returns. An average product warranty of approximately 28.5 years and 11 consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer further strengthen its appeal for bankable project financing and residential rooftop installs requiring long-term reliability assurance. Topsky Energy reportedly offers PERC and TOPCon modules with outputs up to 695 Wp according to its own website, but the absence of independently verified performance data in major industry databases makes it difficult to assess suitability beyond small, price-sensitive residential applications.

For international buyers - whether project developers, EPCs, or residential installers - Jinko Solar is the clear choice between the two when bankability, product availability, and long-term warranty support are priorities. Topsky Energy may appeal in price-sensitive markets where formal project financing is not required, but the absence of Tier 1 status, limited independent review data, and sub-1 GW production capacity make it a higher-risk option for any project of significant scale.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Topsky Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-topsky-energy)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Topsky Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-topsky-energy)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Topsky Energy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-topsky-energy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-topsky-energy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.