---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Top Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Top Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-top-solar"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Top Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 1 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Top Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Shenzhen |
| Founded | 2006 |  |
| Employees | 33,830 | 200+ |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | \<1 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.topsolar-energy.com](https://www.topsolar-energy.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Shenzhen Top Solar Energy Co., Ltd. is a Chinese solar panel manufacturer specializing in monocrystalline, flexible, folding, and portable solar panels, as well as off-grid and on-grid solar power systems. The company has its own R&D teams and production lines, serving customers across the US, Europe, Japan, the...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Top Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 1 | +636 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 150 W | +585 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 150 W | +373 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Top Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 18.60% | +6.20 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 18.60% | +3.58 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Top Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.420%/°C | +0.116 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 0 (0%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Top Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 1 (100.0%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Top Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 1 (100.0%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (100%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Top Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |
| Back Contact | 0 | 1 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Top Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TS-EFS150M](https://comparepv.com/panel/top-solar-ts-efs150m) | 150 | 18.6 | -0.420 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Top Solar occupy entirely different tiers of the global solar PV industry. Jinko Solar was founded in 2006, is headquartered in China, and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). With a production capacity of 130 GW, a workforce of over 33,800 employees, and confirmed Bloomberg Tier 1 bankability status, Jinko ranks among the top two or three module manufacturers worldwide by shipment volume - having recorded 41.84 GW of module shipments in H1 2025 alone. The company has an extensive portfolio of 545 panel models and holds multiple world records at the cell level, including a 27.79% TOPCon cell efficiency. Top Solar, by contrast, is a small Chinese manufacturer with over 200 employees and a production capacity below 1 GW. Its catalog, as currently documented, consists of a single 150 Wp module based on back contact cell technology. Top Solar does not appear on Bloomberg Tier 1 lists and has no publicly verifiable bankability rating.

Jinko Solar's strength lies in its breadth and technical depth. Its TOPCon N-type modules - representing nearly 40% of its catalog - deliver an average efficiency of approximately 22% and a best-in-class temperature coefficient of -0.31%/°C, limiting performance losses during hot weather. Nearly 32% of Jinko's lineup consists of bifacial modules, making the brand well suited to utility-scale ground-mount projects, large commercial C&I rooftop installations, and high-yield residential rooftop installs where long warranties (averaging over 28 years) and financing security matter. Top Solar's 150 Wp back contact panel targets a narrow niche: off-grid systems, marine and RV applications, campsites, and small autonomous energy setups where low unit power and compact form factor take priority over maximum efficiency - its 18.6% module efficiency and -0.42%/°C temperature coefficient are both below the industry mainstream.

For buyers selecting between the two for grid-tied residential or commercial projects, Jinko Solar is the clear choice given its scale, verified bankability, diverse product range, and demonstrated long-term reliability. Top Solar is not a realistic alternative for mainstream grid-connected installations but may serve integrators sourcing low-wattage modules for off-grid or specialty applications where Jinko's larger format panels are simply not applicable.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Top Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-top-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Top Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-top-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Top Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-top-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-top-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.