---
title: "Jinko Solar vs TN Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs TN Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-tn-solar"
---

# Jinko Solar vs TN Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 10 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. TN Solar leans bifacial (50% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | TN Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China |  |
| Headquarters | Shanghai |  |
| Founded | 2006 |  |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |  |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | TN Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 10 | +627 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 715 W | +20 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 542 W | +20 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | TN Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.02% | +1.78 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 21.08% | +1.09 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | TN Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.280%/°C | +0.024 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 5 (50%) | +14 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +1.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | TN Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 5 (50.0%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 4 (40.0%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 1 (10.0%) |


## Power distribution

TN Solar offers more 600W+ panels (50% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | TN Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 5 (50.0%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 1 (10.0%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 4 (40.0%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (50%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | TN Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 5 (50.0%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 5 (50.0%) |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, TN Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE6-66HBD-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/tn-solar-se6-66hbd-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE6-66HBD-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/tn-solar-se6-66hbd-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE6-66HBD-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/tn-solar-se6-66hbd-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE6-66HBD-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/tn-solar-se6-66hbd-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE6-66HBD-695](https://comparepv.com/panel/tn-solar-se6-66hbd-695) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TN5-54H-390](https://comparepv.com/panel/tn-solar-tn5-54h-390) | 390 | 20.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TN5-54H-385](https://comparepv.com/panel/tn-solar-tn5-54h-385) | 385 | 19.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TN5-54H-380](https://comparepv.com/panel/tn-solar-tn5-54h-380) | 380 | 19.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TN5-54H-375](https://comparepv.com/panel/tn-solar-tn5-54h-375) | 375 | 19.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TN5-54H-370](https://comparepv.com/panel/tn-solar-tn5-54h-370) | 370 | 19.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and TN Solar are both Chinese solar module manufacturers, but they differ substantially in scale, market standing, and global reach. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, employs 33,830 people and operates with a production capacity of 130 GW - placing it among the world's largest solar panel manufacturers. Its Tier 1 bankable status reflects strong financial standing and independently verified product quality, facilitating access to project financing across all market segments. TN Solar is a considerably smaller producer without Tier 1 designation, offering a catalogue of just 10 panels - suggesting a focus on niche, OEM, or emerging export markets rather than broad global distribution. The company holds ISO 9001, CE, and TUV certifications and produces modules across PERC, TOPCon, and HJT technologies.

Jinko Solar's portfolio is anchored by TOPCon cell technology (39.4% of its 545-panel range), with a maximum module efficiency of 24.8% and a portfolio average of 22.0%. The Tiger Neo series has earned 11 consecutive PVEL Top Performer awards from 2015 through 2025 and surpassed 200 GW in cumulative shipments by mid-2025 - making it the bestselling single solar module series in PV industry history. A bifacial share of 31.9% and an average temperature coefficient of -0.31%/°C support versatile deployment across residential rooftop installs, commercial and industrial C&I projects, and ground-mount utility-scale farms worldwide. TN Solar, by contrast, concentrates on HJT technology (50% of its catalogue), achieving a maximum efficiency of 23.02% and a portfolio average of 21.08%. Its temperature coefficient of -0.28%/°C is marginally superior, indicating better performance retention in high-heat environments, while its 50% bifacial share and average warranty of 30 years - compared to 28.5 years for Jinko Solar - may appeal in premium residential and commercial applications where long-term yield guarantees carry weight.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision comes down to risk profile and procurement requirements. Jinko Solar's Tier 1 status, large production scale, extensive certification history, and documented reliability record make it the standard choice for bankable utility-scale projects, institutional procurement, or any installation requiring financeable and auditable supplier credentials. TN Solar's HJT technology and marginally better temperature coefficient could attract buyers in premium C&I or residential segments who prioritize low-irradiance performance and extended warranty terms, but the absence of Tier 1 recognition and a limited public track record necessitate careful due diligence before committing to large-volume or long-term supply contracts.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs TN Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-tn-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs TN Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-tn-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs TN Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-tn-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-tn-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.