---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Tangra - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Tangra solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-tangra"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Tangra

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Tangra |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Wuxi |
| Founded | 2006 | 2016 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 500-1000 |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | 5-10 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.thornova-solar.com](https://www.thornova-solar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Tangra is the flagship solar module product line of Sunova Solar Technology Co., Ltd. (rebranded as Thornova Solar), a Chinese photovoltaic manufacturer founded in 2016 and headquartered in Wuxi, Jiangsu Province. The company specializes in high-efficiency N-type TOPCon bifacial modules under the Tangra series (S, M...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Tangra | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 0 | +637 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 0 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 0 W | +523 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Tangra | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Tangra | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 0 (0%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Tangra |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Tangra |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Tangra |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Tangra are both Chinese solar PV manufacturers, but they occupy very different positions in the global market. Jinko Solar was founded in 2006 and has grown into one of the world's largest panel producers, with a workforce of over 33,800 employees, a production capacity of 130 GW per year, and a listing on the NYSE. It holds Tier 1 bankable status and has a broad international distribution network spanning Europe, North America, Asia, and beyond. Tangra, founded a decade later in 2016, is a considerably smaller operation with an estimated 500 to 1,000 employees and a production capacity in the 5-10 GW range. It also carries Tier 1 bankable status, which is meaningful for project financing, but its global footprint and brand recognition remain limited compared to Jinko.

Jinko Solar's technology portfolio is extensive and well-documented, covering over 545 panel models with peak output reaching 735 Wp and maximum module efficiency of 24.8%, driven by its N-type TOPCon cell platform. The average temperature coefficient of approximately -0.31%/°C per degree Celsius and an average product warranty close to 28.5 years make Jinko panels well-suited for residential rooftop installs, commercial C&I projects, and large utility-scale ground-mount systems alike. Nearly 32% of its portfolio consists of bifacial modules, reflecting a strong push toward ground-mount applications with albedo gain. Tangra's technical specifications are not publicly documented in detail, making a panel-level comparison difficult - its Tier 1 status suggests a baseline of quality and financial stability, but prospective buyers should request current datasheets and warranty terms directly from distributors before committing to a project.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar offers a lower-risk procurement path backed by decades of manufacturing experience, verifiable performance data, record-breaking TOPCon cell efficiency, and robust after-sales infrastructure. Tangra may appeal to buyers seeking an alternative mid-tier supplier with potential pricing flexibility, particularly for smaller or regionally focused projects, but the limited availability of independent reviews and panel-level data means additional due diligence is essential before selecting it for any sizeable installation.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Tangra](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-tangra)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Tangra](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-tangra)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Tangra](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-tangra)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-tangra

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.