---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Sunova - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Sunova solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-sunova"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Sunova

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 183 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Sunova leans bifacial (92% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Sunova |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Hefei |
| Founded | 2006 | 2008 |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.sunovasolar.com](https://www.sunovasolar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Sunova | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 183 | +454 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 720 W | +15 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 523 W | +1 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Sunova | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.20% | +1.60 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 21.60% | +0.58 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Sunova | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.317%/°C | +0.013 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 168 (92%) | +56 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 28.4 yrs | +0.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Sunova |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 46 (25.1%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 70 (38.3%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 57 (31.1%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 10 (5.5%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Sunova |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 84 (45.9%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 58 (31.7%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 31 (16.9%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 10 (5.5%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Sunova |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 12 (6.6%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 72 (39.3%) |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 89 (48.6%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 10 (5.5%) |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Sunova


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TS-BGT66(720)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-720-g12) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TS-BWT66(720)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-720-g12) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TS-BGT66(715)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-715-g12) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TS-BWT66(715)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-715-g12) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TS-BGT66(710)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-710-g12) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TS-BWT66(710)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-710-g12) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TS-BGT66(705)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-705-g12) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TS-BWT66(705)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-705-g12) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TS-BGT66(700)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-700-g12) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TS-BWT66(700)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-700-g12) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Sunova are both Chinese solar PV module manufacturers, yet they differ substantially in scale, market standing, and financial credibility. Jinko Solar was founded in 2006 and has grown into one of the world's largest PV module producers, with a manufacturing capacity of 130 GW and a workforce exceeding 33,000 employees. Listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Jinko holds confirmed Tier 1 bankable status and was ranked the most bankable solar module company in BloombergNEF's 2024 PV Module Bankability Survey, earning an AAA rating from PV Tech in Q1 2025 - the highest score globally. The company has shipped over 300 GW cumulatively across more than 190 countries. Sunova, founded in 2008, operates at a considerably smaller scale with an aggregate manufacturing capacity of approximately 3 GW, and does not hold Tier 1 bankable status per the available data, placing it in a materially different risk category for project finance and insurance purposes.

From a technology standpoint, Jinko Solar's portfolio of 545 panel models is heavily oriented toward N-type TOPCon cells, which account for nearly 40% of its lineup and enable a maximum module efficiency of 24.8% with an average of 22.0% across the range. A temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C and an average warranty period of 28.5 years reflect a mature, high-performance product range well suited to residential rooftop installs, commercial C&I projects, and large-scale utility ground-mount deployments. Roughly 32% of Jinko's portfolio is bifacial, indicating broad coverage of monofacial applications with an average module power of 511 Wp. Sunova, by contrast, leads with PERC as its dominant cell technology at 48.6% of its 183-model lineup, reaching a maximum efficiency of 23.2% and an average of 21.6%. Its most distinguishing characteristic is a bifacial penetration rate of 91.8%, making it particularly well-positioned for ground-mount utility and commercial C&I projects where bifacial gain can meaningfully boost energy yield, alongside an average module power of 523 Wp.

For international buyers selecting between the two, Jinko Solar is the lower-risk choice across virtually all project types - its Tier 1 status, NYSE listing, global service network, and dominant production capacity of 130 GW reduce counterparty and bankability risk for lenders and asset managers alike. Sunova can be a cost-competitive alternative for bifacial-heavy ground-mount or C&I projects where Tier 1 bankability is not a hard financing requirement, but prospective buyers should carefully assess long-term warranty support capacity given the company's significantly smaller operational footprint.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Sunova](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sunova)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Sunova](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-sunova)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Sunova](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-sunova)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-sunova

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.