---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Suniva - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Suniva solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-suniva"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Suniva

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Suniva |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | United States |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Norcross, Georgia |
| Founded | 2006 | 2007 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 100-200 |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | 1-3 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://suniva.com](https://suniva.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Suniva is an American manufacturer of monocrystalline silicon photovoltaic solar cells, spun out of Georgia Tech's University Center of Excellence in Photovoltaics in 2007. After filing for bankruptcy in 2017 and emerging under new ownership in 2019, the company restarted manufacturing operations in Norcross, Georgia...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Suniva | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 0 | +637 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 0 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 0 W | +523 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Suniva | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Suniva | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 0 (0%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Suniva |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Suniva |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Suniva |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Suniva represent vastly different tiers of the global solar PV industry. Founded in 2006 in China, Jinko Solar is the world's largest solar module manufacturer by shipment volume, recording approximately 41 GW of shipments in the first half of 2025 alone and holding a total production capacity of 130 GW. The company is NYSE-listed, carries Tier 1 bankable status, employs over 33,000 people, and has accumulated more than 300 GW of global installations. Suniva, founded one year later in 2007 in Norcross, Georgia, had a dramatically different trajectory: the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2017, overwhelmed by low-cost Asian competition, and is now in a slow manufacturing restart phase. With only 100-200 employees and production capacity in the 1-3 GW range, Suniva currently functions primarily as a solar cell manufacturer rather than a module brand - it has no finished panels available to end customers at this time.

Jinko Solar's technology portfolio centers on N-type TOPCon cells, which account for roughly 39% of its 545-panel lineup. Modules reach up to 735 Wp, with a maximum rated efficiency of 24.8% and an average across the portfolio of approximately 22%. The company has set a verified lab record of 27.79% efficiency for a TOPCon cell, certified by Germany's ISFH institute. A low average temperature coefficient of around -0.308%/°C and an average product warranty of approximately 28.5 years make Jinko modules well-suited for residential rooftop installs, commercial C&I projects, and large utility-scale ground-mount arrays where bifacial modules (nearly 32% of the portfolio) can maximize energy yield. Suniva's current value proposition is entirely different: in partnership with Corning and module assembler Heliene, it is building the only fully domestic US supply chain for solar - polysilicon and wafers from Michigan, cells from Georgia - targeting US investors seeking IRA domestic content bonuses. A 4.5 GW cell factory in South Carolina is planned for 2027.

For international buyers outside the United States, Jinko Solar is the clear practical choice: it offers a broad, immediately available portfolio of high-efficiency TOPCon modules backed by Tier 1 bankability and 11 consecutive years of PVEL Top Performer recognition. Suniva's proposition is narrowly tailored to US-based projects requiring domestic content certification under the Inflation Reduction Act and carries the added uncertainty of a company still rebuilding after bankruptcy. Buyers in Europe or other markets will find no Suniva products available, while Jinko Solar's global distribution network and financial stability make it a straightforward default for nearly any project type or geography.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Suniva](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-suniva)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Suniva](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-suniva)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Suniva](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-suniva)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-suniva

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.