---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Sungrow - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Sungrow solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-sungrow"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Sungrow

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Sungrow |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Hefei |
| Founded | 2006 | 1997 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 15000-20000 |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS | SZSE: 300274 |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.sungrowpower.com](https://www.sungrowpower.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Sungrow (Sungrow Power Supply Co., Ltd.) is the world's leading manufacturer of solar PV inverters and energy storage systems, headquartered in Hefei, Anhui, China. Founded in 1997, the company specializes in string and central inverters, wind converters, floating PV systems, and utility-scale battery storage...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Sungrow | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 0 | +637 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 0 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 0 W | +523 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Sungrow | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Sungrow | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 0 (0%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Sungrow |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Sungrow |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Sungrow |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, and Sungrow, founded in 1997 and also headquartered in China, are both major forces in the solar PV industry but occupy fundamentally different positions in the value chain. Jinko Solar is one of the world's largest solar module manufacturers, with a production capacity of 130 GW, a portfolio of over 545 panel models, a maximum rated output of 735 Wp, and module efficiency reaching 24.8%. Listed on the NYSE and holding Tier 1 bankable status, Jinko has achieved PVEL Top Performer recognition for eleven consecutive years and has surpassed 300 GW of cumulative global installations. Sungrow, listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE) and founded by Professor Cao Renxian, is primarily a solar inverter and energy storage system manufacturer - it does not produce solar panels. With over 870 GW of power electronics installed across more than 150 countries, Sungrow co-leads the global inverter market alongside Huawei.

Jinko Solar's competitive edge lies in its module technology, particularly the N-type TOPCon series representing roughly 39% of its current portfolio. These panels deliver average efficiencies around 22%, degradation rates of approximately 0.4% per year, and product warranties averaging over 28 years - attributes that make them well suited for residential rooftop installs, commercial and industrial (C&I) rooftop projects, and large utility-scale ground-mount systems wherever long-term bankable performance is a priority. Sungrow's portfolio addresses the conversion and storage side of the same projects: its string and central inverters achieve up to 98.5% conversion efficiency, feature built-in smart PID recovery, and connect to the iSolarCloud monitoring platform, making Sungrow a preferred inverter supplier across all installation segments from small residential systems to multi-hundred-megawatt solar farms.

For international buyers, Jinko Solar and Sungrow are complementary rather than competing vendors. Pairing Jinko modules with Sungrow inverters is a widely adopted combination in European, Australian, and Asian markets, balancing strong panel bankability and yield performance with cost-effective, reliable power conversion. Buyers seeking a single-supplier solution for both modules and inverters will need to look elsewhere, but those assembling best-in-class component combinations will find this pairing competitive on both performance and price.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Sungrow](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sungrow)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Sungrow](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-sungrow)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Sungrow](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-sungrow)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-sungrow

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.