---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Solaria - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Solaria solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-solaria"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Solaria

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 27 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Solaria |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Spain |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Madrid |
| Founded | 2006 | 2002 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 235 |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | 1.658 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS | BME (Madrid Stock Exchange): SLR |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.solaria.com](https://www.solaria.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Solaria is a leading European company focused on developing and generating solar photovoltaic energy. The company aims to contribute to decarbonization by creating a global energy model based on clean energy. Solaria specializes in the implementation and development of solar photovoltaic technology, from manufacturing...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Solaria | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 27 | +610 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 680 W | +55 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 436 W | +87 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Solaria | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 21.92% | +2.88 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 19.96% | +2.22 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Solaria | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.360%/°C | +0.055 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 5 (19%) | +18 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 26.5 yrs | +2.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Solaria |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 13 (48.1%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 9 (33.3%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 5 (18.5%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Solaria |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 14 (51.9%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 8 (29.6%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 5 (18.5%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (19%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Solaria |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 5 (18.5%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 4 (14.8%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 18 (66.7%) |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Solaria


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SPV680-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solaria-spv680-tg12-132bd) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SPV675-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solaria-spv675-tg12-132bd) | 675 | 21.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SPV670-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solaria-spv670-tg12-132bd) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SPV665-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solaria-spv665-tg12-132bd) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SPV660-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solaria-spv660-tg12-132bd) | 660 | 21.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [PowerXT 430R-PL](https://comparepv.com/panel/solaria-powerxt-430r-pl) | 430 | 20.4 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Solaria PowerXT-430C-PD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solaria-solaria-powerxt-430c-pd) | 430 | 19.8 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [PowerXT 420R-PL](https://comparepv.com/panel/solaria-powerxt-420r-pl) | 420 | 19.9 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Solaria PowerXT-420C-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solaria-solaria-powerxt-420c-bd) | 420 | 19.4 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Solaria PowerXT-420C-PD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solaria-solaria-powerxt-420c-pd) | 420 | 19.4 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Solaria represent very different tiers of the global solar PV manufacturing landscape. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 in China and listed on the New York Stock Exchange, has grown into the world's largest solar module manufacturer by shipment volume, with an annual production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of more than 33,800 employees. The company holds confirmed Tier 1 bankable status, making it a preferred supplier for large-scale projects that require project finance or lender approval. Solaria, founded in 2002 and headquartered in Madrid, Spain, is listed on the BME (Madrid Stock Exchange) and operates at a far smaller scale - 1.658 GW of production capacity and just 235 employees. Unlike Jinko's pure-play module manufacturing model, Solaria combines panel production with the development and operation of solar power plants across Spain, Italy, Greece, Portugal, and Uruguay, giving it a dual identity as both manufacturer and independent power producer focused on the European market.

Jinko Solar's portfolio of 545 panel models spans the full spectrum of applications, with maximum power output of 735 Wp, average output of 511 Wp, and peak efficiency of 24.8% (average 22.0%). The company's leading cell technology is TOPCon (N-type), accounting for roughly 39% of its lineup, and its bifacial share stands at approximately 32%. An average temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C and an average warranty duration of nearly 28.5 years strengthen its case for residential rooftop installs, commercial C&I projects, and utility-scale ground-mount installations alike. Solaria's portfolio is considerably narrower - 27 models - with a maximum output of 680 Wp, average output of 436 Wp, and peak efficiency of 21.92% (average 19.96%). Its bifacial share is around 18.5%, and the average warranty duration is approximately 26.5 years. The higher average temperature coefficient of -0.360%/°C is a relative disadvantage in warm climates, though the company's European manufacturing heritage and hands-on experience operating solar assets across Southern Europe provide meaningful real-world credibility.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision largely hinges on project scale and risk appetite. Jinko Solar's Tier 1 bankability, production scale, deep technology portfolio, and consistent track record make it the lower-risk choice for utility-scale and commercial projects where lender acceptance and long-term supply security are critical. Solaria suits buyers prioritizing European supply chain proximity or who value a manufacturer with direct operational experience running solar plants - but its smaller scale, narrower panel range, and absence of confirmed Tier 1 status limit its competitiveness for large, internationally financed projects.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Solaria](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-solaria)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Solaria](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-solaria)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Solaria](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-solaria)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-solaria

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.