---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Silfab - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Silfab solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-silfab"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Silfab

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 47 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Silfab |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Canada |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Mississauga |
| Founded | 2006 | 2010 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 800+ |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | 1.6 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.silfabsolar.com](https://www.silfabsolar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Silfab Solar is a North American leader in the design, development, and manufacture of high-efficiency, premium-quality solar cells and modules. Leveraging over 40 years of solar experience, they operate fully automated facilities in Washington, South Carolina, and Ontario, Canada. Their products are designed and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Silfab | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 47 | +590 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 640 W | +95 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 429 W | +94 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Silfab | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 22.92% | +1.88 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 20.56% | +1.62 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Silfab | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.341%/°C | +0.037 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 14 (30%) | +6 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +1.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Silfab |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 19 (40.4%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 5 (10.6%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 10 (21.3%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 13 (27.7%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Silfab |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 22 (46.8%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 10 (21.3%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 12 (25.5%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 3 (6.4%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (45%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Silfab |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 1 (2.1%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 19 (40.4%) |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 21 (44.7%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 6 (12.8%) |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Silfab


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SIL-640 XL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-640-xl) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SIL-630 XL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-630-xl) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SIL-620 XL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-620-xl) | 620 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SIL-590 XM+](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-590-xm) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-580-xm-bifacial) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-570-xm-bifacial) | 570 | 22.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SIL-570 XM+](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-570-xm) | 570 | 22.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SIL-540-XM-BIFACIAL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-540-xm-bifacial) | 540 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SIL-530 QM](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-530-qm) | 530 | 22.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SIL-530 XM](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-530-xm) | 530 | 22.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, is one of the world's largest solar module manufacturers, listed on the NYSE and employing over 33,800 people with a production capacity of 130 GW per year. The company has surpassed 300 GW in cumulative global shipments and holds Tier 1 bankable status, making it a default choice for project financiers worldwide. Silfab, by contrast, was founded in 2010 and is headquartered in Canada, with manufacturing facilities in Ontario and Washington state. With roughly 800 employees and a production capacity of 1.6 GW, Silfab operates at a vastly smaller scale but has established a strong reputation in the North American residential and commercial market, also holding Tier 1 bankable status and consistently ranking among the top-rated brands on major U.S. review platforms.

Jinko's portfolio spans 545 panel models, with a maximum power output of 735 Wp and a maximum module efficiency of 24.8%, anchored by its Tiger NEO TOPCon series - a cell technology representing approximately 39% of its lineup. The breadth of the portfolio and competitive pricing make Jinko particularly well-suited to utility-scale ground-mount and large commercial C&I projects where cost-per-watt and module uniformity are paramount; its global distributor network also supports residential rooftop installs at scale across Europe, Asia-Pacific, and beyond. Silfab's 14-panel portfolio is narrower but coherent: N-type technology dominates at over 71% of its lineup, with a maximum efficiency of 22.6% and a maximum output of 570 Wp. A notable Silfab differentiator is its 50% bifacial module share - compared to 31.9% for Jinko - and a uniform 30-year product warranty across its entire range, versus Jinko's portfolio average of approximately 28.5 years. Both manufacturers show near-identical temperature coefficients of around -0.31%/°C, indicating comparable thermal performance in warm climates. Silfab's Buy American Act certification and domestic U.S. manufacturing make it especially appealing for federally funded projects and buyers who prioritize supply chain transparency.

For international buyers outside North America, Jinko Solar is the practical and widely accessible choice, backed by unmatched manufacturing scale, a broad product range covering everything from small residential rooftop systems to multi-hundred-megawatt ground-mount projects, and deep distributor networks on every major continent. Silfab is best suited to North American residential and commercial buyers who value domestic manufacturing, a simplified product selection, and a strong 30-year warranty commitment. Between the two, Jinko offers greater volume security and global flexibility for large-scale procurement, while Silfab delivers a focused, warranty-backed proposition that resonates particularly well with U.S. homeowners and installers working within federally regulated or incentivized frameworks.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Silfab](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-silfab)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Silfab](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-silfab)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Silfab](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-silfab)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-silfab

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.