---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Sharp - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Sharp solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-sharp"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/jinko-solar/sharp.png"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Sharp

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 19 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Sharp leans bifacial (53% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Japan |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Sakai, Osaka Prefecture |
| Founded | 2006 | 1912 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 40,123 |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | 15.4 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS | TYO: 6753 |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://global.sharp](https://global.sharp) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Sharp Corporation is a Japanese electronics company founded in 1912. It operates globally, offering a wide range of products including consumer electronics, home appliances, energy solutions, and business solutions. Since 2016, it has been majority-owned by Foxconn.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Sharp | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 19 | +618 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 740 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 576 W | +53 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Sharp | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.82% | +0.98 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 22.20% | +0.02 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Sharp | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.004 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 10 (53%) | +16 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 27.6 yrs | +1.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Sharp skews to higher efficiency: 32% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 1 (5.3%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 7 (36.8%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 5 (26.3%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 6 (31.6%) |


## Power distribution

Sharp offers more 600W+ panels (37% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 6 (31.6%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 6 (31.6%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 7 (36.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (37%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 5 (26.3%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 7 (36.8%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 7 (36.8%) |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Sharp


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [GSD8K66H-740WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-740wt) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [GSD8K66H-735WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-735wt) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [GSD8K66H-730WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-730wt) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [GSD8K66H-725WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-725wt) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [GSD8K66H-720WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-720wt) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [GSD8K66H-715WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-715wt) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [GSD8K66H-710WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-710wt) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [NB-JD580](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd580) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NB-JD575](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd575) | 575 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [NB-JD570](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd570) | 570 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Sharp represent fundamentally different profiles within the global solar PV manufacturing landscape. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, is the world's largest solar module manufacturer by shipments, with an annual production capacity of 130 GW and approximately 33,830 employees. Listed on the NYSE, the company has consistently held the top global shipment position, reporting shipments approaching 93 GW annually by 2025. Sharp, by contrast, is a Japanese electronics conglomerate with roots dating back to 1912, listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TYO). With a production capacity of 15.4 GW and around 40,123 employees, Sharp is a significantly smaller solar producer, though one with a long heritage of photovoltaic innovation, including early pioneering work in HJT cell technology. Both companies hold Tier 1 bankable status, signifying strong financial standing and manufacturing reliability. A pivotal development, however, is that Sharp Energy Solutions Europe (SESE) ceased operations in the European solar market in March 2025, substantially reducing the brand's commercial presence and after-sales support across the continent.

Jinko Solar's technological portfolio is centered on TOPCon cell technology, which accounts for nearly 40% of its 545-panel lineup. Its commercial modules reach a maximum panel efficiency of 24.8% and a peak power output of 735 Wp, while ongoing laboratory records have pushed TOPCon cell efficiency well beyond 27%. The broad portfolio - with an average module power of 511 Wp and a 31.9% bifacial share - suits utility-scale ground-mount projects, large commercial and industrial (C&I) installations, and residential rooftop deployments alike, giving installers wide flexibility. Sharp's narrower lineup of 19 panels leans on HJT as its leading cell technology and delivers a higher average module power of 575.8 Wp, a notably higher bifacial penetration of 52.6%, and a slightly better average temperature coefficient of -0.300%/°C versus Jinko's -0.308%/°C. Sharp's maximum commercial panel efficiency stands at 23.82%. These characteristics have made Sharp modules well-suited for space-constrained commercial rooftops and high-yield ground-mount installations where energy output per square meter is the primary driver.

For international buyers making a procurement decision between the two, Jinko Solar is the more straightforward choice in terms of supply chain reliability, global distribution reach, and long-term warranty support - averaging 28.5 years across its portfolio. Sharp's European market exit in early 2025 introduces meaningful uncertainty around warranty fulfilment, spare parts availability, and ongoing technical support for installations in European markets. Buyers in regions where Sharp still maintains active commercial operations may find its high-power HJT modules compelling for premium projects, but the risk profile for European and many other markets has shifted considerably. For most buyers, Jinko Solar's scale, TOPCon technology leadership, and global commercial ubiquity make it the lower-risk and more bankable long-term manufacturing partner.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Sharp](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sharp)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Sharp](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-sharp)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Sharp](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-sharp)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-sharp

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.