---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Seraphim - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Seraphim solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-seraphim"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Seraphim

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 160 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Seraphim leans bifacial (69% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2006 | 2011 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 1001-5000 |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | 13 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.seraphim-energy.com](https://www.seraphim-energy.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Seraphim is a world-class solar products manufacturer specializing in research, development, production, and sales of solar PV products. The company has achieved significant milestones, outpacing competitors in production capacity and innovative designs. Seraphim is committed to technological innovation and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 160 | +477 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 730 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 549 W | +27 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.50% | +1.30 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 21.82% | +0.36 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.316%/°C | +0.012 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 111 (69%) | +33 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 28.8 yrs | +0.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 32 (20.0%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 58 (36.2%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 51 (31.9%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 19 (11.9%) |


## Power distribution

Seraphim offers more 600W+ panels (35% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 2 (1.2%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 55 (34.4%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 47 (29.4%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 45 (28.1%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 11 (6.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (52%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 66 (41.2%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 4 (2.5%) |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 84 (52.5%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 6 (3.8%) |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Seraphim


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SRP-730-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-730-bhc-bg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SRP-725-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-725-bhc-bg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SRP-720-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-bhc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SRP-720-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-btc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SRP-715-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-bhc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SRP-715-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-btc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SRP-710-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-bhc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SRP-710-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-btc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SRP-705-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-bhc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SRP-705-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-btc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Seraphim are both Tier 1 bankable Chinese PV module manufacturers, but they differ substantially in corporate scale, market reach, and industry standing. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the New York Stock Exchange, operates with a production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce exceeding 33,000 employees, making it one of the world's largest solar manufacturers by volume and a consistent leader in global module shipment rankings. Seraphim, founded in 2011, operates at a considerably smaller scale with 13 GW of production capacity and an estimated 1,001 to 5,000 employees, yet has established a presence in over 40 countries and maintains Tier 1 bankability - an important credential for project finance. While both companies originate from China, Jinko's NYSE listing and substantially larger manufacturing base provide measurable advantages in supply security, financial transparency, and institutional recognition.

Both manufacturers have adopted TOPCon as their leading cell technology - Jinko across 39.5% of its broad 545-model portfolio, and Seraphim across 48.5% of its more focused 136-model lineup. Jinko holds the edge in maximum module efficiency at 24.8% versus Seraphim's 23.5%, and has demonstrated sustained R&D leadership through world-record TOPCon cell results at the laboratory level. Seraphim differentiates itself through a notably higher share of bifacial panels - 72.8% of its portfolio compared to 31.9% for Jinko - and a higher average panel output of 550.8 Wp against Jinko's 511 Wp. For utility-scale ground-mount and large commercial C&I projects demanding proven supply chains and maximum bankability, Jinko Solar is the benchmark choice. Seraphim's bifacial-heavy portfolio makes it particularly competitive for ground-mount installations and residential rooftop projects where rear-side irradiance gain is realistically achievable, along with budget-conscious buyers who still require Tier 1 credentials.

For international buyers selecting between the two, the decision typically hinges on project type and procurement priorities. Jinko Solar is the stronger fit for large-scale deployments where module availability, brand recognition, and a multi-decade performance track record are essential. Seraphim offers a compelling alternative for cost-sensitive or bifacial-focused projects, supported by a slightly longer average product warranty of 29.0 years versus 28.5 years for Jinko - a meaningful differentiator over a system's full operational life.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-seraphim)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-seraphim)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-seraphim)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-seraphim

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.