---
title: "Jinko Solar vs SchmitzSolar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs SchmitzSolar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-schmitzsolar"
---

# Jinko Solar vs SchmitzSolar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | SchmitzSolar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Germany |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Lingen (Ems) |
| Founded | 2006 | 2018 |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://schmitzsolar.de](https://schmitzsolar.de) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

SchmitzSolar (operated by T. Schmitz – Int. Handel) is a German B2B photovoltaic distributor and trader, not a panel manufacturer. Based in Lingen (Ems), the company supplies installers, project developers, and commercial customers across Europe with solar modules, inverters, and accessories sourced from over 25...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | SchmitzSolar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 0 | +637 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 0 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 0 W | +523 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | SchmitzSolar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | SchmitzSolar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 0 (0%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | SchmitzSolar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | SchmitzSolar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | SchmitzSolar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and SchmitzSolar represent vastly different positions in the global solar PV industry. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, is one of the world's largest module manufacturers by shipment volume, with a production capacity of 130 GW per year and over 33,800 employees. Listed on the NYSE, the company has shipped more than 370 GW of modules cumulatively to nearly 200 countries. Jinko holds Tier 1 status according to BloombergNEF and was recognized as the only manufacturer with a 100% bankability rating in the 2025 BNEF survey - a distinction it has held for over ten consecutive years. SchmitzSolar, founded in 2018 and based in Germany, is a much younger and smaller company. No panel data, technical specifications, or industry rankings for SchmitzSolar appear in major PV databases or independent industry publications, making a quantitative comparison impossible on current evidence.

Jinko Solar's product portfolio covers 545 panel models, with a maximum module power of 735 Wp and a maximum efficiency of 24.8%, anchored by its N-type TOPCon technology in the Tiger Neo series. The lineup spans compact residential modules for rooftop installs to high-wattage bifacial panels suited to utility-scale ground-mount and commercial C&I projects. An average warranty of approximately 28.5 years and a low annual degradation rate strengthen the value case for project finance applications. SchmitzSolar, with no publicly documented module portfolio, cannot be assessed in terms of specific use cases or technical strengths based on available information. Its German origin may appeal to buyers prioritizing European manufacturing provenance, but this would need to be verified against actual production and certification data.

For international buyers making a selection between the two, Jinko Solar is the clear choice where bankability, product availability, and a proven long-term track record are priorities - whether for residential rooftop installs, large commercial rooftops, or utility-scale projects. SchmitzSolar would require thorough due diligence, including review of current certifications, datasheet verification, and direct engagement with the manufacturer, before it could be seriously considered alongside an established Tier 1 supplier.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs SchmitzSolar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-schmitzsolar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs SchmitzSolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-schmitzsolar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs SchmitzSolar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-schmitzsolar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-schmitzsolar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.