---
title: "Jinko Solar vs S-Energy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs S-Energy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-s-energy"
---

# Jinko Solar vs S-Energy

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 91 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. S-Energy leans bifacial (77% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | S-Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Seoul |
| Founded | 2006 | 2011 |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.s-energy.com](https://www.s-energy.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | S-Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 91 | +546 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 665 W | +70 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 512 W | +10 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | S-Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 22.38% | +2.42 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 21.00% | +1.18 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | S-Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.339%/°C | +0.035 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 70 (77%) | +41 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 27.7 yrs | +0.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | S-Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 50 (54.9%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 34 (37.4%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 7 (7.7%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | S-Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 4 (4.4%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 36 (39.6%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 40 (44.0%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 11 (12.1%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (59%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | S-Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 25 (27.5%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 54 (59.3%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 12 (13.2%) |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, S-Energy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SL85-66BDL-665R](https://comparepv.com/panel/s-energy-sl85-66bdl-665r) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SL85-66BDL-660R](https://comparepv.com/panel/s-energy-sl85-66bdl-660r) | 660 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SL85-66BDL-655R](https://comparepv.com/panel/s-energy-sl85-66bdl-655r) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SL85-66BDL-650R](https://comparepv.com/panel/s-energy-sl85-66bdl-650r) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SL85-66BDL-645R](https://comparepv.com/panel/s-energy-sl85-66bdl-645r) | 645 | 20.8 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SL65-78TDP-625R](https://comparepv.com/panel/s-energy-sl65-78tdp-625r) | 625 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SL65-78TDP-620R](https://comparepv.com/panel/s-energy-sl65-78tdp-620r) | 620 | 22.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SL65-78TDP-615R](https://comparepv.com/panel/s-energy-sl65-78tdp-615r) | 615 | 22.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SL65-78TDP-610R](https://comparepv.com/panel/s-energy-sl65-78tdp-610r) | 610 | 21.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SL65-78TDP-605R](https://comparepv.com/panel/s-energy-sl65-78tdp-605r) | 605 | 21.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and S-Energy represent two markedly different tiers of the global solar PV manufacturing landscape. Founded in 2006 in China and publicly listed on the NYSE, Jinko Solar is the world's largest solar module manufacturer by cumulative shipments - having delivered over 93 GW in 2024 alone and surpassing 300 GW cumulatively, with an estimated 13% global market share and a production capacity of 130 GW. The company employs over 33,800 people and holds Tier 1 bankable status, making it a preferred partner for project finance in utility-scale and commercial developments worldwide. S-Energy, founded in 2011 and headquartered in South Korea, operates at a significantly smaller scale with a portfolio of 91 panels and does not hold Tier 1 bankable status, which limits its appeal for large financed projects. While South Korea's manufacturing reputation lends S-Energy credibility in select markets, its geographic reach and brand recognition remain regionally focused compared to Jinko's global distribution network.

On the technology front, Jinko Solar leads with N-type TOPCon cells representing 39.4% of its 545-panel portfolio, achieving a maximum module efficiency of 24.8% and an average efficiency of 22.0%, paired with a favorable average temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C. This combination makes Jinko well-suited for residential rooftop installs, utility-scale ground-mount projects, and commercial C&I applications where high power density and long-term output consistency are priorities. Its average product warranty of 28.5 years and wattage range reaching 735 Wp give installers flexibility across all project segments. S-Energy's portfolio is dominated by PERC technology (59.3% of panels), with a maximum efficiency of 22.38% and an average temperature coefficient of -0.339%/°C. Its most distinctive feature is an exceptionally high share of bifacial modules - 76.9% of the portfolio - which makes it competitive for ground-mount and flat-roof commercial C&I installations where albedo gains from bifacial light capture can meaningfully boost annual energy yield.

For most international buyers - particularly those sourcing panels for bankable utility-scale or commercial projects - Jinko Solar is the more straightforward choice, backed by Tier 1 status, a laboratory-verified TOPCon cell efficiency record of 27.79%, and a proven global supply chain with consistent volume availability. S-Energy may appeal to cost-conscious buyers pursuing bifacial ground-mount deployments at smaller scale, though the absence of Tier 1 status and lower maximum efficiency are meaningful constraints for larger or project-financed installations where lender approval and long-term performance guarantees are critical.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs S-Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-s-energy)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs S-Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-s-energy)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs S-Energy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-s-energy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-s-energy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.