---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Runtech China - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Runtech China solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-runtech-china"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Runtech China

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 21 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Runtech China |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Xi'an |
| Founded | 2006 | 2008 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 50+ |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [http://www.runtechenergy.com](http://www.runtechenergy.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Runtech Energy, founded in 2008, is a leading independent solar production supplier and designer. They are a trader of solar modules and PV project developer, with over 500MW of premium quality modules deployed worldwide. Runtech is committed to providing high-quality solar products and system integration services.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Runtech China | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 21 | +616 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 420 W | +315 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 301 W | +222 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Runtech China | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 24.30% | +0.50 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 18.59% | +3.59 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Runtech China | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.350%/°C | +0.045 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 1 (5%) | +32 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +3.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Runtech China |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 13 (61.9%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 4 (19.0%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 3 (14.3%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 1 (4.8%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Runtech China |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 16 (76.2%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 5 (23.8%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Runtech China |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 21 (100.0%) |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Runtech China


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RT420WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt420wm) | 420 | 21.6 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RT415WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt415wm) | 415 | 21.3 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RT410WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt410wm) | 410 | 21.0 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RT405WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt405wm) | 405 | 20.8 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RT400WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt400wm) | 400 | 20.5 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RT395WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt395wm) | 395 | 20.2 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RT390WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt390wm) | 390 | 20.0 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RT-355M](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt-355m) | 355 | 18.5 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline |
| 9 | [RT 355M](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt-355m-1) | 355 | 18.5 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline |
| 10 | [RT-350M](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt-350m) | 350 | 18.0 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Runtech China are both Chinese solar PV manufacturers, but they occupy fundamentally different positions in the global market. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, is one of the world's largest solar module producers, with a module production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of over 33,800 employees. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status and has consistently ranked among the top global module shippers, delivering approximately 99 GW of modules, cells and wafers in 2024 alone, representing roughly 13% of global market share. Runtech China, established in 2008, is a much smaller operation with just over 50 employees and a limited product portfolio of 21 panels. It holds no verified Tier 1 status, positioning it as a niche or budget-oriented supplier rather than a mainstream market player with the financial backing and supply chain depth that large-scale projects typically demand.

In terms of technology, Jinko Solar leads with a portfolio heavily oriented toward high-efficiency N-type TOPCon cells, which account for approximately 39% of its lineup. The company achieves a maximum module power of 735 Wp, a maximum panel efficiency of 24.8%, and an average efficiency of around 22.0%, supported by a favorable average temperature coefficient of Pmax at -0.308%/°C - indicating strong real-world performance across varying climate conditions. Nearly 32% of Jinko's portfolio consists of bifacial modules, making it well suited for utility-scale ground-mount installations, large commercial C&I projects, and residential rooftop installs where premium efficiency and long-term output guarantees are priorities. Runtech China's portfolio tops out at 420 Wp with an average efficiency of approximately 18.6% and a less competitive temperature coefficient of -0.350%/°C. With only 4.8% bifacial modules and unspecified cell technology across its entire range, Runtech's offering is better positioned for small off-grid applications or budget-sensitive projects where bankability and technology traceability are secondary concerns.

For international buyers and project developers evaluating both companies, Jinko Solar is the clear choice for any project requiring third-party financing, long-term warranty support averaging over 28 years, and a proven global supply chain. Runtech China may serve a limited role in very small or cost-driven contexts, but the lack of transparent cell technology disclosure, the small operational scale, and the absence of Tier 1 recognition make it a risky selection for projects where performance guarantees and bankability are essential criteria.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Runtech China](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-runtech-china)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Runtech China](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-runtech-china)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Runtech China](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-runtech-china)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-runtech-china

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.