---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Runergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Runergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-runergy"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Runergy

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 124 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Runergy leans bifacial (77% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Yancheng, Jiangsu Province |
| Founded | 2006 | 2013 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 15,000 |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | 23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [http://www.runergy.com](http://www.runergy.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 124 | +513 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 740 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 579 W | +57 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 24.10% | +0.70 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 22.42% | +0.24 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.298%/°C | +0.006 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 95 (77%) | +40 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +0.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 9 (7.3%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 26 (21.0%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 48 (38.7%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 41 (33.1%) |


## Power distribution

Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 36 (29.0%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 28 (22.6%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 35 (28.2%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 25 (20.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (60%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 74 (59.7%) |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 32 (25.8%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 18 (14.5%) |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Runergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY-DH132H10-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY-DH132H10-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY-DH132H10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY-DH132N10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY-DH132H10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY-DH132N10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Runergy are both Chinese Tier 1 solar module manufacturers, yet they differ substantially in scale, history, and market positioning. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, employs over 33,800 people and holds a production capacity of 130 GW, making it one of the world's largest module producers and a consistent global shipment leader with cumulative deliveries exceeding 300 GW. Its catalog spans 545 panel models, serving residential, commercial, and utility-scale buyers across virtually every major market. Runergy, established in 2013 with approximately 15,000 employees, built its reputation as a top-three global solar cell manufacturer, reporting 63 GW of cell capacity alongside 23 GW of module production capacity - and has opened a 5 GW module facility in Alabama, giving it a US manufacturing footprint that few peers can match. Both companies carry Tier 1 bankable status, meaning project financiers and EPC contractors can accept modules from either brand as bankable collateral.

On the technology front, Jinko Solar leads with its TOPCon platform covering 39.4% of its portfolio, achieving a maximum module efficiency of 24.8% and an average of 22.0%; average panel output across the range stands at 511 Wp. Runergy leans heavily on N-type technology across 58.2% of its catalog, with an average efficiency of 22.2% and a notably higher average panel power of 574 Wp - peaking at 740 Wp. Runergy's most distinctive characteristic is its bifacial penetration rate of 78.6%, compared to Jinko's 31.9%, making it especially well suited to utility-scale ground-mount projects where bifacial energy gain drives down the levelized cost of energy. Both manufacturers offer competitive temperature coefficients (-0.308%/°C for Jinko, -0.303%/°C for Runergy) and long product warranties averaging 28.5 and 28.9 years respectively. Runergy has also earned the RETC Highest Achiever recognition for three consecutive years, supporting confidence in module quality.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision hinges primarily on project type and supply chain priorities. Jinko Solar's unmatched global brand recognition, NYSE-listed transparency, and vast product range make it the lower-risk option for residential rooftop installs, commercial C&I projects, and markets where bankability documentation is paramount. Runergy is a compelling choice for utility-scale ground-mount and large commercial rooftop projects that prioritize high per-panel output and bifacial performance - its deep cell manufacturing expertise and independent test recognition make it a credible alternative for buyers willing to look beyond the top-tier household names.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-runergy)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-runergy)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-runergy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-runergy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.