---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Runergy New Energy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Runergy New Energy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-runergy-new-energy"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Runergy New Energy

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Runergy New Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Yancheng |
| Founded | 2006 | 2013 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 15,000+ |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | 63+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [http://www.runergy.com](http://www.runergy.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Runergy is an international PV technology company specializing in the research, development, manufacturing, and distribution of PV solar cells and modules. By the end of 2023, the company had shipped over 65 GW of solar cells. Runergy operates production facilities in China and overseas for polysilicon, wafers, cells...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Runergy New Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 0 | +637 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 0 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 0 W | +523 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Runergy New Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Runergy New Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 0 (0%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Runergy New Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Runergy New Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Runergy New Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2006 and headquartered in Shanghai, widely recognized as one of the largest solar module producers in the world. It has earned BloombergNEF's Tier 1 bankability designation for over ten consecutive years and, as of 2024, holds a 100% bankability rating - making it the only module maker to achieve that distinction - alongside an AAA rating in PV Tech's Q4 2024 bankability survey. By the end of 2025, the company targets an annual module production capacity of approximately 130 GW. Runergy New Energy - formally Jiangsu Runergy New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. - was founded in 2013 and is headquartered in Jiangsu province, China. It has secured BNEF Tier 1 status for six consecutive quarters since 2023 and operates cell manufacturing facilities in China, Thailand, and the United States (Huntsville, Alabama), with roughly 63 GW of global cell capacity and around 23 GW of planned module capacity. On institutional footprint and financing track record, Jinko Solar holds a commanding lead.

Both companies have pivoted their core product lines to N-type TOPCon technology. Jinko Solar's Tiger Neo series - now reaching a fifth-generation variant rated at up to 700 W with a module efficiency of approximately 25.9% as confirmed by PV Magazine - targets premium residential rooftops, large commercial installations, and utility-scale ground mounts. Runergy markets its modules under the Hyperion brand, covering bifacial residential and distributed commercial applications; its TOPCon module has been independently certified at a front-side efficiency above 24.9%, and its in-house R&D - conducted in partnership with Fraunhofer ISE and UNSW Australia - produced a 26.55% efficient M10 TOPCon cell certified by Germany's ISFH. Runergy ranked first in PV Magazine's bifacial module energy-yield test, a result that signals genuine performance credibility even if the brand remains less familiar to most buyers than Jinko.

For a typical buyer in 2025 - whether a residential installer, an independent power producer, or a procurement team financing a utility project - Jinko Solar is the lower-risk default. Its decade-long bankability record, global distribution network, and deep warranty infrastructure reduce lender and insurer friction that newer Tier 1 entrants still face. Runergy is a credible choice for cost-conscious buyers or those operating in markets where the company has established supply chains, and its cell-efficiency achievements suggest the technology gap is narrow. The two brands are not interchangeable at the procurement level, but the performance of their modules in the field is increasingly comparable.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2026/06/03/jinkosolar-launches-700-w-topcon-solar-module-with-25-91-efficiency/ \| JinkoSolar launches 700 W TOPCon module with 25.91% efficiency \| article

\- https://jinkosolar.eu/news/jinkosolar-once-again-achieves-aaa-rating-in-pv-tech-q4-2024-bankability-report-leading-global-pv-innovation/ \| JinkoSolar achieves AAA rating in PV Tech Q4 2024 bankability report \| article

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/runergy-develops-26-55-efficient-m10-topcon-solar-cell/ \| Runergy develops 26.55% efficient M10 TOPCon solar cell \| article

\- https://solarbytes.info/business-bytes/runergy-bnef-tier1-q1-2025-solar-module-expansion-8764407 \| Runergy secures BNEF Tier 1 PV Maker status for sixth quarter \| article

\- https://www.runergy.com/runergys-n-type-modules-achieve-top-ranking-in-pv-magazines-latest-performance-test/ \| Runergy N-Type modules achieve top ranking in PV Magazine test \| article

Sources:

\- \[JinkoSolar launches 700 W TOPCon solar module with 25.91% efficiency\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2026/06/03/jinkosolar-launches-700-w-topcon-solar-module-with-25-91-efficiency/)

\- \[JinkoSolar achieves AAA rating in PV Tech Q4 2024 bankability report\](https://jinkosolar.eu/news/jinkosolar-once-again-achieves-aaa-rating-in-pv-tech-q4-2024-bankability-report-leading-global-pv-innovation/)

\- \[Runergy develops 26.55% efficient M10 TOPCon solar cell\](https://www.pv-tech.org/runergy-develops-26-55-efficient-m10-topcon-solar-cell/)

\- \[Runergy secures BNEF Tier 1 PV Maker status for sixth quarter\](https://solarbytes.info/business-bytes/runergy-bnef-tier1-q1-2025-solar-module-expansion-8764407)

\- \[Runergy N-Type modules achieve top ranking in PV Magazine test\](https://www.runergy.com/runergys-n-type-modules-achieve-top-ranking-in-pv-magazines-latest-performance-test/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Runergy New Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-runergy-new-energy)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Runergy New Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-runergy-new-energy)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Runergy New Energy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-runergy-new-energy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-runergy-new-energy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.