---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Runda Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Runda Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-runda-solar"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Runda Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 6 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Runda Solar leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Runda Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Yancheng, Jiangsu Province |
| Founded | 2006 | 2009 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 800+ |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | 4GW (modules), 8GW (cells), 1GWh (energy storage) GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS | NEEQ (National Equities Exchange and Quotations): 832391 |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | http://www.rundaenergy.com/ (redirects to https://www.rundapv.com/) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Runda Solar (Jiangsu Runda PV Co., Ltd.) is a high-tech company dedicated to manufacturing world-class solar photovoltaic modules. The company's business covers the entire photovoltaic industry chain, including R&D, production, and sales of PV modules, as well as energy storage and smart grid solutions. Runda Solar...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Runda Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 6 | +631 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 730 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 718 W | +195 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Runda Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.50% | +1.30 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 23.10% | +0.92 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Runda Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.310%/°C | +0.006 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 6 (100%) | +64 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +1.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Runda Solar skews to higher efficiency: 67% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Runda Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 2 (33.3%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 4 (66.7%) |


## Power distribution

Runda Solar offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Runda Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 6 (100.0%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (100%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Runda Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 6 (100.0%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Runda Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RS730S9-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/runda-solar-rs730s9-132gant) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RS725S9-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/runda-solar-rs725s9-132gant) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RS720S9-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/runda-solar-rs720s9-132gant) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RS715S9-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/runda-solar-rs715s9-132gant) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RS710S9-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/runda-solar-rs710s9-132gant) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RS705S9-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/runda-solar-rs705s9-132gant) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Runda Solar are both Chinese photovoltaic module manufacturers, but they differ sharply in scale, market standing, and portfolio breadth. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006, is one of the world's largest solar manufacturers with over 33,800 employees and a module production capacity of 130 GW. Listed on the NYSE, it holds Bloomberg New Energy Finance Tier 1 bankable status and achieved a 100% bankability rating in 2024, ranking first globally among module makers. With 545 panel models in its catalog and cumulative shipments approaching 370 GW - and six number-one rankings in annual global module shipments - Jinko represents a dominant force in the PV industry. Runda Solar, founded in 2009, is a considerably smaller operation with over 800 employees, a module production capacity of 4 GW, 8 GW of cell manufacturing capacity, and 1 GWh of energy storage production. It is listed on China's NEEQ, a smaller over-the-counter exchange, and does not hold Tier 1 bankable status, which limits its suitability for project-financed developments.

On the technology side, Jinko Solar fields a broad portfolio where TOPCon cells account for 39.4% of its lineup, with panel efficiencies reaching a maximum of 24.8% and an average of 22.0%. Its Tiger Neo series has set multiple world records in TOPCon cell efficiency, and the company has been a PVEL Top Performer for 11 consecutive years - a key indicator of manufacturing consistency. Runda Solar, by contrast, offers a tightly focused range of just 6 panel models, all bifacial TOPCon, with an average output of 717.5 Wp and an average efficiency of 23.1%. For residential rooftop installations, Jinko's vast catalog provides flexibility across a wide range of roof sizes and power classes. For utility-scale ground-mount and commercial C&I projects, Jinko's Tier 1 status and independently verified performance history are decisive factors for bankability. Runda Solar's 100% bifacial TOPCon portfolio and 30-year product warranty - slightly ahead of Jinko's average of 28.5 years - can appeal to commercial buyers seeking high-output bifacial panels, particularly in markets where the company has an established local presence such as Poland and Germany.

International buyers choosing between the two should weigh Jinko Solar's global track record, financial transparency as a NYSE-listed company, and extensive verified performance data against Runda Solar's more specialized all-bifacial-TOPCon portfolio and marginally longer warranty terms. For projects requiring third-party bankability assessments or institutional financing, Jinko Solar is the substantially safer choice, while Runda Solar may suit smaller commercial or specialist bifacial deployments where buyers are able to conduct their own independent due diligence.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Runda Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-runda-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Runda Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-runda-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Runda Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-runda-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-runda-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.