---
title: "Jinko Solar vs RMCIP - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs RMCIP solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-rmcip"
---

# Jinko Solar vs RMCIP

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 1 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | RMCIP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Russia |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Ryazan |
| Founded | 2006 | 1963 |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | \<0.1 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [http://rmcip.com](http://rmcip.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Ryazan Metal Ceramics Instrumentation Plant JSC (RMCIP) is a Russian industrial manufacturer established in 1963, primarily known as the only producer of sealed magnetically operated contacts (reed switches) in Russia and CIS countries. The company also manufactures crystalline silicon photovoltaic solar modules (RZMP...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | RMCIP | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 1 | +636 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 200 W | +535 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 200 W | +323 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | RMCIP | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 12.40% | +12.40 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 12.40% | +9.78 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | RMCIP | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.400%/°C | +0.096 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 0 (0%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +3.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | RMCIP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 1 (100.0%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | RMCIP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 1 (100.0%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | RMCIP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 1 (100.0%) |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, RMCIP


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RZMP-200-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/rmcip-rzmp-200-t) | 200 | 12.4 | -0.400 | Polycrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and RMCIP represent two entirely different categories of solar PV manufacturer. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in Shanghai, China, is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and holds Tier 1 bankable status - a critical qualification for project financing. With a production capacity of 130 GW per year and a workforce of over 33,800 employees, it consistently ranks among the top one or two module suppliers globally by shipment volume, having shipped approximately 93 GW in 2024 alone. RMCIP - the Ryazan Metal Ceramics Instrumentation Plant - is a Russian state-linked enterprise founded in 1963 whose primary business is the manufacture of reed switches and precision electronic components. Its solar panel activity is marginal, with a production capacity below 0.1 GW, no Tier 1 bankability certification, and a portfolio of a single commercially documented module rated at 200 Wp. No independent performance reviews or PVEL scorecards are available for RMCIP products.

Jinko Solar's technology portfolio spans 545 panel models with a maximum output of 735 Wp and an average module efficiency of 22.0%. Its flagship N-type TOPCon technology - representing nearly 40% of its lineup - has achieved world-record lab cell efficiency of 27.79% and delivers a temperature coefficient of -0.31%/°C, making it well-suited for both residential rooftop installations and large-scale utility ground-mount projects. The Tiger Neo 3.0 series has recently secured close to 150 MW in European distributed PV orders, including supply agreements in Poland. Jinko has held Top Performer status in PVEL module reliability scorecards for 11 consecutive years. RMCIP's single documented panel uses an unknown cell technology, carries a temperature coefficient of -0.40%/°C, offers no bifacial option, and comes with a 25-year warranty that lacks the financial backing of a Tier 1 manufacturer.

For international buyers - whether sourcing for residential rooftop, commercial C&I, or utility-scale projects - Jinko Solar is the clear choice between these two: it offers a broad, high-efficiency portfolio, verified manufacturing consistency, bankable status for project finance, and an established European distribution network. RMCIP has no practical competitive positioning outside of a very narrow domestic Russian context and should not be considered a viable alternative for projects requiring long-term performance guarantees or third-party financial due diligence.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs RMCIP](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-rmcip)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs RMCIP](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-rmcip)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs RMCIP](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-rmcip)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-rmcip

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.