---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Risen - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Risen solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-risen"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Risen

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 153 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Risen leans bifacial (82% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Ninghai |
| Founded | 2006 | 1986 |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS | SZSE: 300118 |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.risenenergy.com](https://www.risenenergy.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Risen | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 153 | +484 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 745 W | +10 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 547 W | +25 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Risen | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 24.00% | +0.80 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 21.82% | +0.36 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Risen | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.291%/°C | +0.013 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 125 (82%) | +45 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +0.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 4 (2.6%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 24 (15.7%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 52 (34.0%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 57 (37.3%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 16 (10.5%) |


## Power distribution

Risen offers more 600W+ panels (39% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 13 (8.5%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 46 (30.1%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 34 (22.2%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 42 (27.5%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 18 (11.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (39%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 60 (39.2%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 45 (29.4%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 48 (31.4%) |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Risen


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RSM132-8-745BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-745bhdg) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RSM132-8-740BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-740bhdg) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RSM132-8-735BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-735bhdg) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RSM132-8-730BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-730bhdg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RSM132-8-725BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-725bhdg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RSM132-8-720BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-720bhdg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RSM132-8-715BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-715bhdg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RSM132-8-700-715BHDG-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700-715bhdg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (715W)](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700-715bhdg-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [RSM132-8-710BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-710bhdg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Risen Energy are both Chinese Tier 1 bankable solar panel manufacturers, but they differ substantially in scale, history, and global market footprint. Jinko Solar was founded in 2006 and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), employing over 33,800 people with a production capacity of 130 GW per year - a scale that places it among the largest solar manufacturers in the world. Risen Energy, listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE), has been active since 1986, giving it a considerably longer industrial heritage, though it operates at a smaller scale with a portfolio of 153 panel models compared to Jinko's 545. Both companies carry Tier 1 bankability status, making them acceptable to project lenders and financiers globally. Research indicates Jinko holds roughly 13% global module market share, while Risen commands a smaller but still meaningful share of around 4%, with both brands recognized as PVEL Top Performers.

On the technology side, both manufacturers have approximately 39% of their portfolios based on TOPCon cell architecture, but they diverge markedly in bifacial coverage: Risen has 81.7% of its portfolio in bifacial modules, compared to 31.9% at Jinko. This makes Risen a particularly strong candidate for utility-scale ground-mount and commercial C&I projects where bifacial panels can capture reflected irradiance and generate measurable energy gains. Risen also benefits from a slightly better average temperature coefficient of power (-0.291 %/°C versus -0.308 %/°C for Jinko), which is advantageous in warm climates or poorly ventilated rooftop installations. Jinko leads on maximum module efficiency at 24.8% versus 24.0% for Risen, and offers the broader product range with a maximum output of 735 Wp. Risen's average panel power of 547 Wp exceeds Jinko's 511 Wp, and its average product warranty is marginally longer at 29.1 years versus Jinko's 28.5 years.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar is the safer default for residential rooftop installations and any project where brand recognition, broad distributor availability, and ease of financing are priorities. Risen represents a compelling alternative for utility-scale and C&I developers who prioritize bifacial yield and temperature performance, particularly in sun-rich regions. Both brands deliver solid quality assurance, and the final decision will typically depend on project-specific technical requirements, local distributor support, and price competitiveness at the time of procurement.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Risen](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-risen)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Risen](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-risen)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Risen](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-risen)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-risen

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.