---
title: "Jinko Solar vs REC - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs REC solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-rec"
---

# Jinko Solar vs REC

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 58 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. REC leans bifacial (59% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | REC |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Norway |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Sandvika |
| Founded | 2006 | 1996 |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.recgroup.com](https://www.recgroup.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | REC | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 58 | +579 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 640 W | +95 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 385 W | +137 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | REC | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 22.80% | +2.00 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 18.92% | +3.26 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | REC | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.004 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 34 (59%) | +22 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 25.5 yrs | +3.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | REC |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 20 (34.5%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 8 (13.8%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 15 (25.9%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 15 (25.9%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | REC |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 21 (36.2%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 26 (44.8%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 1 (1.7%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 10 (17.2%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (59%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | REC |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 2 (3.4%) |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 22 (37.9%) |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 34 (58.6%) |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, REC


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [REC640AA PRO M](https://comparepv.com/panel/rec-rec640aa-pro-m) | 640 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [REC640AA Pro MG](https://comparepv.com/panel/rec-rec640aa-pro-mg) | 640 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [REC630AA PRO M](https://comparepv.com/panel/rec-rec630aa-pro-m) | 630 | 22.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [REC630AA Pro MG](https://comparepv.com/panel/rec-rec630aa-pro-mg) | 630 | 22.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [REC620AA PRO M](https://comparepv.com/panel/rec-rec620aa-pro-m) | 620 | 21.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [REC620AA Pro MG](https://comparepv.com/panel/rec-rec620aa-pro-mg) | 620 | 21.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [REC610AA PRO M](https://comparepv.com/panel/rec-rec610aa-pro-m) | 610 | 21.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [REC610AA Pro MG](https://comparepv.com/panel/rec-rec610aa-pro-mg) | 610 | 21.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [REC600AA PRO M](https://comparepv.com/panel/rec-rec600aa-pro-m) | 600 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [REC600AA Pro MG](https://comparepv.com/panel/rec-rec600aa-pro-mg) | 600 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and REC represent two fundamentally different approaches to the solar PV business, diverging in scale, technology focus, and target market. Jinko Solar was founded in 2006 in China and is listed on the NYSE; with a production capacity of 130 GW and more than 33,800 employees, it ranks among the world's largest solar module manufacturers by shipment volume. Its product catalog spans 545 panel models, reaching a maximum output of 735 Wp and a peak module efficiency of 24.8%. REC was founded in Norway in 1996 - a full decade before Jinko - and has built its identity as a premium European-heritage manufacturer. With a more focused range of 55 models and a maximum output of 640 Wp, REC competes on technology quality rather than volume. Both manufacturers hold Tier 1 bankable status, confirming their financial credibility and suitability for project-financed installations.

Jinko Solar's portfolio is anchored by TOPCon (Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact) cell technology, which accounts for 39.4% of its lineup and underpins its highest-performing modules, with an average panel power across the full range of 511 Wp. This breadth and capacity make Jinko a natural choice for utility-scale ground-mount projects and large commercial C&I installations, where competitive cost-per-watt and supply volume are decisive factors. REC leads with HJT (Heterojunction) cells, which represent 56.4% of its portfolio - a higher concentration of its flagship technology than Jinko achieves with TOPCon. REC also carries a notably higher proportion of bifacial panels at 56.4%, well above Jinko's 31.9%, making it particularly well-suited for bifacial ground-mount and premium residential rooftop installations. REC's average temperature coefficient of -0.306%/°C is marginally better than Jinko's -0.308%/°C, offering a slight energy yield advantage in high-temperature conditions. With an average panel power of 381 Wp, REC's lineup is better aligned with premium residential and mid-scale commercial projects than with high-volume utility deployments.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar offers a compelling proposition wherever volume, product variety, and competitive pricing are the primary drivers - particularly for utility-scale or large C&I deployments. REC is the stronger pick for premium residential and commercial projects where buyers prioritize European brand provenance, HJT cell technology, and a high bifacial panel ratio. One notable counterpoint to REC's premium image: Jinko's average warranty across its full portfolio stands at 28.5 years, exceeding REC's 25.5-year average - worth weighing alongside the overall positioning of each brand. Both are credible, Tier 1-certified manufacturers, but they occupy meaningfully different positions on the price-performance spectrum.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs REC](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-rec)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs REC](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-rec)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs REC](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-rec)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-rec

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.