---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Rarlon PV Tech - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Rarlon PV Tech solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-rarlon-pv-tech"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Rarlon PV Tech

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 52 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Rarlon PV Tech |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Ningbo |
| Founded | 2006 |  |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [http://www.rarlonsolar.com](http://www.rarlonsolar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Rarlon PV Tech, also known as Rarlon Solar, has specialized in the solar field for over 10 years. They are a professional manufacturer and supplier of green energy products, engaging in the production and installation of solar panels, solar systems, and solar projects. Their products are exported to various countries...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Rarlon PV Tech | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 52 | +585 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 550 W | +185 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 351 W | +172 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Rarlon PV Tech | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 21.50% | +3.30 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 18.33% | +3.85 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Rarlon PV Tech | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.439%/°C | +0.135 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 0 (0%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +3.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Rarlon PV Tech |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 40 (76.9%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 9 (17.3%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 3 (5.8%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Rarlon PV Tech |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 42 (80.8%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 5 (9.6%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 5 (9.6%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (77%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Rarlon PV Tech |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 40 (76.9%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 12 (23.1%) |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Rarlon PV Tech


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RL550HM](https://comparepv.com/panel/rarlon-pv-tech-rl550hm) | 550 | 21.5 | -0.470 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RL545HM](https://comparepv.com/panel/rarlon-pv-tech-rl545hm) | 545 | 21.3 | -0.470 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RL540HM](https://comparepv.com/panel/rarlon-pv-tech-rl540hm) | 540 | 21.1 | -0.470 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RL535HM](https://comparepv.com/panel/rarlon-pv-tech-rl535hm) | 535 | 20.9 | -0.470 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RL530HM](https://comparepv.com/panel/rarlon-pv-tech-rl530hm) | 530 | 20.7 | -0.470 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RL420HM-144](https://comparepv.com/panel/rarlon-pv-tech-rl420hm-144) | 420 | 20.9 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RL415HM-144](https://comparepv.com/panel/rarlon-pv-tech-rl415hm-144) | 415 | 20.6 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RL410HM-144](https://comparepv.com/panel/rarlon-pv-tech-rl410hm-144) | 410 | 20.4 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [RL405HM-144](https://comparepv.com/panel/rarlon-pv-tech-rl405hm-144) | 405 | 20.2 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [RL400HM-144](https://comparepv.com/panel/rarlon-pv-tech-rl400hm-144) | 400 | 20.0 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Rarlon PV Tech are both Chinese solar panel manufacturers, but they occupy vastly different positions in the global market. Founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, Jinko Solar is one of the world's largest PV manufacturers with an annual module production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of over 33,000 employees. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status and was ranked the most bankable PV brand by BloombergNEF for ten consecutive years, achieving a 100% bankability rating in 2024. With approximately 13% global market share and 86 GW shipped in 2025, Jinko is a dominant force in the industry. Rarlon PV Tech, headquartered in Ningbo, is a significantly smaller manufacturer with over 15 years of experience in the solar sector and TUV, CE, and ISO9001 certifications, but it does not appear in any major bankability or Tier 1 rankings. Its portfolio consists of 52 panel models, compared to Jinko's 545.

On a technology level, Jinko Solar leads with a strong TOPCon (N-type) offering - its top cell technology - across nearly 40% of its portfolio, delivering an average module efficiency of around 22% and a maximum of 24.8%. Its average temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C and approximately 32% bifacial product share make it well-suited for utility-scale ground-mount projects, commercial and industrial (C&I) rooftop systems, and high-performance residential installs. Maximum panel output reaches 735 Wp. Rarlon PV Tech, by contrast, relies heavily on PERC technology (around 77% of its portfolio), with an average efficiency of approximately 18.3% and a maximum of 21.5%. Its average temperature coefficient of -0.439%/°C represents a notable disadvantage in warmer conditions, and the portfolio contains no bifacial products. The maximum panel output stands at 550 Wp, with an average of around 351 Wp - reflecting a more entry-level product range.

For international buyers and project developers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar is the clear choice for any project requiring bankable equipment, project finance, or insurance-grade warranties - with an average warranty term of approximately 28.5 years versus Rarlon's 25. Rarlon PV Tech may be considered for small, cost-constrained off-grid or residential systems in markets where Tier 1 bankability is not a prerequisite, but buyers should factor in the higher technology gap and limited independent review data when assessing long-term reliability.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Rarlon PV Tech](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-rarlon-pv-tech)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Rarlon PV Tech](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-rarlon-pv-tech)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Rarlon PV Tech](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-rarlon-pv-tech)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-rarlon-pv-tech

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.