---
title: "Jinko Solar vs QN-SOLAR - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs QN-SOLAR solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-qn-solar"
---

# Jinko Solar vs QN-SOLAR

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | QN-SOLAR |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2006 | 2014 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 5000-10000 |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | 30-40 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.qn-solarpv.com](https://www.qn-solarpv.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

QN-SOLAR (Qn-SOLAR PV Limited) is a China-based integrated photovoltaic manufacturer with six production bases across China, specializing in N-TOPCon solar cells and modules. The company officially launched its global business in 2022 and has expanded into upstream and downstream PV production, reaching a combined...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | QN-SOLAR | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 0 | +637 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 0 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 0 W | +523 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | QN-SOLAR | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | QN-SOLAR | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 0 (0%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | QN-SOLAR |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | QN-SOLAR |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | QN-SOLAR |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and QN-SOLAR are both Chinese solar PV manufacturers, but they occupy very different tiers of the global market. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, is the world's largest solar module manufacturer by shipped volume, with a production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of over 33,000. The company has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankable status for more than a decade consecutively and has deployed over 300 GW across 190-plus countries, cementing its reputation as one of the most financially reliable and globally recognized suppliers in the industry. QN-SOLAR, founded in 2014, is a considerably younger company that only launched its global PV business in 2022. It operates four manufacturing bases in China with a reported production capacity of 39 GW and a workforce exceeding 10,000. The company is actively working toward BloombergNEF Tier 1 status but has not yet achieved it, placing it in a different risk category for project finance purposes.

Jinko Solar's technology portfolio spans 545 panel models, with maximum output reaching 735 Wp and peak module efficiency of 24.8%. N-type TOPCon cells account for nearly 40% of the lineup, and the Tiger Neo series - which achieves world-record TOPCon cell efficiencies in laboratory conditions - is particularly well suited to utility-scale ground-mount projects and large commercial C&I installations where low degradation rates (approximately 0.4% annually) and bifacial gain matter most. Residential rooftop installers also benefit from Jinko's broad model range and straightforward bankability. QN-SOLAR positions itself as a TOPCon-focused manufacturer with reported panel efficiencies up to 23% and an average of around 21.4%, and may appeal to cost-sensitive buyers in the residential segment, though its smaller public data footprint makes independent performance benchmarking more limited compared to Jinko.

For international buyers - project developers, EPCs, or institutional investors - Jinko Solar is the lower-risk choice given its established Tier 1 status, NYSE listing, extensive independent test data, and global after-sales infrastructure. QN-SOLAR represents a potential value option for smaller residential or commercial projects where bankability requirements are less strict, but buyers should request independent test certifications and verify warranty support coverage in their target market before committing at scale.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs QN-SOLAR](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-qn-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs QN-SOLAR](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-qn-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs QN-SOLAR](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-qn-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-qn-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.