---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Q-SUN Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Q-SUN Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-q-sun-solar"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Q-SUN Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 111 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Q-SUN Solar leans bifacial (68% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Q-SUN Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai |  |
| Founded | 2006 | 2014 |
| Employees | 33,830 |  |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.q-sunsolar.com](https://www.q-sunsolar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Qn-SOLAR officially launched its global PV business in 2022. The company is headquartered in Shanghai, China, and has four manufacturing bases in China. As a professional and integrated company, Qn-SOLAR operates in various fields of PV upstream and downstream, achieving an annual production capacity of 20GW PV cells...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Q-SUN Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 111 | +526 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 730 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 543 W | +20 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Q-SUN Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.70% | +1.10 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 21.91% | +0.27 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Q-SUN Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.303%/°C | +0.001 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 76 (68%) | +32 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 28.7 yrs | +0.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Q-SUN Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 15 (13.5%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 39 (35.1%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 45 (40.5%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 12 (10.8%) |


## Power distribution

Q-SUN Solar offers more 600W+ panels (30% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Q-SUN Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 1 (0.9%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 40 (36.0%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 37 (33.3%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 25 (22.5%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 8 (7.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (42%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Q-SUN Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 20 (18.0%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 47 (42.3%) |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 39 (35.1%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 5 (4.5%) |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-SUN Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [QN-730HJT-01](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-sun-solar-qn-730hjt-01) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [QN-725HJT-01](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-sun-solar-qn-725hjt-01) | 725 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [QN-720HJT-01](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-sun-solar-qn-720hjt-01) | 720 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [QN-715HJT-01](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-sun-solar-qn-715hjt-01) | 715 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [QN-710HJT-01](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-sun-solar-qn-710hjt-01) | 710 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [QN-710HT-01](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-sun-solar-qn-710ht-01) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [QN-705HT-01](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-sun-solar-qn-705ht-01) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [QN-700HT-01](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-sun-solar-qn-700ht-01) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [QN-695HT-01](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-sun-solar-qn-695ht-01) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [QN-690HT-01](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-sun-solar-qn-690ht-01) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Q-SUN Solar represent two very different tiers of the global solar manufacturing landscape. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, is listed on the NYSE and employs over 33,800 people, with a production capacity of 130 GW - placing it among the world's largest PV module manufacturers by volume. The company holds Tier 1 (bankable) status, independently verified by leading financial institutions, and has accumulated over 300 GW of cumulative global shipments. Q-SUN Solar, established in 2014 in Chuzhou, China, operates at a considerably smaller scale - estimated at several gigawatts of annual capacity - and does not hold Tier 1 status. Its product catalog covers 114 panel models compared to Jinko's 545, reflecting the difference in portfolio breadth. In terms of technology, Jinko leads with a maximum efficiency of 24.8% and a peak power of 735 Wp, anchored by its Tiger Neo TOPCon series, which accounts for 39.4% of its portfolio. Q-SUN's top cell technology is N-type, making up 41.2% of its range, with a maximum efficiency of 23.7% and peak power of 730 Wp. Notably, Q-SUN's average panel power (approximately 545.7 Wp) exceeds Jinko's (approximately 511 Wp), and Q-SUN has a markedly higher share of bifacial modules - 66.7% versus 31.9% for Jinko.

For residential rooftop installations, Jinko Solar is a well-proven choice backed by extensive installer networks, reliable spare part availability, and strong European market presence. Its Tier 1 status makes it the preferred option for utility-scale ground-mount projects that require project finance or bank guarantees. The Tiger Neo TOPCon lineup delivers high efficiency with low degradation rates, making it competitive across both residential and commercial C&I segments. Q-SUN Solar, with its high bifacial ratio and a slightly better average temperature coefficient (-0.304%/°C versus -0.308%/°C for Jinko), is better suited for open-field installations where rear-side irradiance is significant - such as agrivoltaic projects or large ground-mount arrays in high-irradiance environments. Its higher average power per panel can also be attractive in space-constrained commercial rooftop scenarios.

For international buyers, Jinko Solar is the lower-risk choice due to its scale, bankability, proven track record, and ease of obtaining long-term service and warranty support globally. Q-SUN may appeal to cost-conscious buyers seeking bifacial-heavy portfolios in the mid-market segment, but due diligence on warranty enforcement, local service availability, and financial stability is strongly recommended before committing to large-scale procurement.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-SUN Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-sun-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-SUN Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-sun-solar)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-SUN Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-sun-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-q-sun-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.