---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-q-cells"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Q-Cells

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 89 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Seoul |
| Founded | 2006 | 1999 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 89 | +548 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 675 W | +60 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 468 W | +54 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.20% | +1.60 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | 21.21% | +0.96 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.020 |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 35 (39%) | +3 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +1.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 7 (7.9%) |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 2 (2.2%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 17 (19.1%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 8 (9.0%) |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 23 (25.8%) |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 38 (42.7%) |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Q-Cells (marketed as Hanwha Q Cells) are both Tier 1 bankable solar manufacturers, but they differ substantially in scale, geographic footprint, and strategic positioning. Jinko Solar was founded in 2006 in China and has grown into one of the largest module producers globally, with a production capacity of 130 GW, more than 33,000 employees, and a listing on the NYSE. Q-Cells, established in 1999 in South Korea, operates at a considerably smaller scale with 11.2 GW of production capacity and trades on NASDAQ. Both carry confirmed Tier 1 bankable status, ensuring financing security for project developers, but Jinko's production scale gives it a clear edge in supply chain depth and volume pricing for large procurement contracts. Jinko has also recorded 11 consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer, underpinning its manufacturing consistency across hundreds of gigawatts of global shipments.

On the technology front, Jinko Solar leads with n-type TOPCon cells as its primary technology - representing roughly 39% of its 545-model portfolio - delivering a maximum module efficiency of 24.8% and an average panel output of 511 Wp, with flagship models reaching 735 Wp. This makes Jinko particularly well suited for utility-scale ground-mount and large commercial C&I projects where power density and cost-per-watt are decisive factors. Its lower average temperature coefficient (-0.308%/°C) also provides a modest performance advantage in warmer climates. Q-Cells centers its 91-model lineup on its proprietary Q.ANTUM PERC technology (approximately 38% of its portfolio), achieving a maximum efficiency of 23.2% and an average output of 462 Wp. The brand commands strong recognition in European and North American residential markets, where its reputation for quality and local service networks supports premium positioning. Q-Cells also carries a notably higher share of bifacial modules (41.8% vs. 31.9% for Jinko), offering flexibility for rooftop or ground-mount installations with reflective surfaces.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar is the stronger fit for high-volume utility-scale or commercial procurement where cutting-edge TOPCon technology, top output, and supply security are priorities. Q-Cells is better suited for residential and light commercial installers who value an established Western-market brand, a curated product range, and strong regional support. Both manufacturers offer product warranties averaging above 27 years, well above the industry norm, making either a sound long-term investment.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.