---
title: "Jinko Solar vs Pylontech - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs Pylontech solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-pylontech"
---

# Jinko Solar vs Pylontech

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | Pylontech |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2006 | 2009 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 2,114 |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year | 7-8.5 (in 2022) GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS | SSE (Shanghai Stock Exchange): 688063 |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://www.pylontech.com.cn](https://www.pylontech.com.cn) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Pylontech is a leading battery energy storage system (BESS) provider, specializing in lithium iron phosphate technology. They offer solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications, integrating expertise in electrochemistry, power electronics, and system integration. The company is dedicated to...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Pylontech | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 0 | +637 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 0 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 0 W | +523 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Pylontech | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | Pylontech | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 0 (0%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | Pylontech |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | Pylontech |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | Pylontech |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and Pylontech are both Chinese companies operating in the renewable energy sector, but a direct comparison as solar panel manufacturers is fundamentally misaligned - because Pylontech does not manufacture solar PV modules. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, is one of the world's largest solar panel producers, with a production capacity of 130 GW and over 33,800 employees. Its portfolio spans 545 panel models with a maximum output of 735 Wp and a peak module efficiency of 24.8%, driven primarily by N-type TOPCon cell technology. Pylontech, founded in 2009 and listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange STAR Market, is a dedicated battery energy storage system (BESS) manufacturer specializing in lithium iron phosphate (LFP) chemistries for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. Both hold Tier 1 status in their respective categories - Jinko Solar from BNEF as a module maker, and Pylontech from BNEF as an energy storage manufacturer.

Jinko Solar's strengths lie squarely in the PV module space: its Tiger Neo series offers industry-leading efficiency, a low temperature coefficient of approximately -0.308%/°C suited to variable climates, a bifacial share of around 32% of its lineup, and an average product warranty exceeding 28 years - making it a strong candidate for residential rooftop installs, commercial C&I projects, and large utility-scale ground-mount farms alike. Pylontech's strengths are entirely complementary: its US and Force H battery series are widely deployed alongside third-party hybrid inverters globally, offering cost-competitive LFP storage with a 10-year product warranty and independently verified fault-free performance in comparative testing. Pylontech products are available in over 80 countries and the company opened its first overseas factory in 2025.

For international buyers, the choice between Jinko Solar and Pylontech is not a binary one - these companies address different segments of the solar energy value chain. A system integrator or installer looking to build a complete solar-plus-storage solution may well deploy both: Jinko Solar modules for generation and Pylontech batteries for storage. Buyers seeking a solar panel supplier should evaluate Jinko Solar on its merits as a top-tier module manufacturer; those sourcing battery storage should assess Pylontech as a leading BESS vendor - the two roles do not overlap.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Pylontech](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-pylontech)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Pylontech](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-pylontech)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Pylontech](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-pylontech)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-pylontech

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.