---
title: "Jinko Solar vs PowMr - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Jinko Solar vs PowMr solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-powmr"
---

# Jinko Solar vs PowMr

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Jinko Solar | PowMr |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Shenzhen |
| Founded | 2006 | 2014 |
| Employees | 33,830 | 100-200 |
| Annual capacity | 130.0 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NYSE: JKS |  |
| Website | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) | [https://powmr.com](https://powmr.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

PowMr, the brand name of Shenzhen Hehejin Industrial Co., Ltd., is a Chinese manufacturer specializing in solar charge controllers (MPPT and PWM), pure sine wave inverter chargers, hybrid inverters, and off-grid solar power systems. The company targets residential and small commercial off-grid and hybrid applications...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Jinko Solar | PowMr | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 637 | 0 | +637 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 0 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 0 W | +523 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Jinko Solar | PowMr | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.18% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Jinko Solar | PowMr | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 231 (36%) | 0 (0%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.7 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Jinko Solar | PowMr |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 23 (3.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 84 (13.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 140 (22.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 206 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 184 (28.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Jinko Solar | PowMr |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 50 (7.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 243 (38.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 176 (27.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 150 (23.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 18 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Jinko Solar | PowMr |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 258 (40.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 195 (30.6%) | 0 |
| PERC | 158 (24.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jinko Solar and PowMr represent fundamentally different tiers of the solar industry, making a direct comparison more of a market-positioning exercise than a technical head-to-head. Jinko Solar was founded in 2006 and is publicly listed on the NYSE, with a declared production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of over 33,800 employees. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status, recognized by leading financial institutions, which is critical for project financing in utility-scale and commercial deployments. With over 300 GW installed globally and 11 consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer, Jinko is one of the most established module manufacturers in the world. PowMr, operating under Shenzhen Hehejin Industrial Co., Ltd. and founded in 2014, is a much smaller company with 100-200 employees focused primarily on solar power electronics - hybrid inverters, MPPT charge controllers, LiFePO4 batteries, and off-grid system kits. The dataset confirms that PowMr has no solar panel portfolio to speak of, and the company does not hold Tier 1 status.

Jinko Solar's module portfolio spans 545 products, with the flagship Tiger Neo N-type TOPCon series reaching up to 24.8% module efficiency and a maximum output of 735 Wp. The average temperature coefficient across the portfolio sits at approximately -0.308%/°C, and average product warranties extend to around 28.5 years. These characteristics make Jinko panels well-suited for residential rooftop installs, large commercial C&I projects, and utility-scale ground-mount arrays alike. PowMr's strength lies in the off-grid and hybrid system segment - its inverters and charge controllers are used in DIY solar builds, mobile applications, and energy-independence setups where a single-vendor ecosystem for power electronics is valued. Customer reviews on platforms such as Trustpilot and Amazon are mixed, with some quality control and firmware concerns noted alongside positive cost-to-value feedback.

For international buyers or developers choosing between the two, the comparison is straightforward: Jinko Solar is a full-scale module manufacturer with a verified global track record, suitable for any project size where panel quality, bankability, and long-term performance guarantees matter. PowMr is not a module manufacturer in the conventional sense and should be evaluated solely as a supplier of solar power electronics and off-grid system components - a different product category altogether.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Jinko Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs PowMr](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-powmr)
- [Jinko Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs PowMr](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-powmr)
- [Jinko Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs PowMr](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-powmr)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-powmr

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.